Article

Beaver Ponds: How do Post-Fire Sediment and Carbon Dynamics Contribute to Watershed Resilience?

Beavers are an important part of river systems and are often referred to as ecosystem engineers. They construct dams using riverside vegetation that pool water on the upstream portion of the river. The dams also slow the water flow. The combined effect of pooling and slowing water allows sediment to settle upstream of the beaver dam, a process that naturally improves water quality.

beaver holding stick
Beaver (Castor canadensis) in water holding a stick.

NPS photo

In 2020 approximately 30,000 acres of Rocky Mountain National Park (RMNP) burned in two wildfires: East Troublesome and Cameron Peak fires. Fires on a landscape have many effects, one of which is facilitating carbon and sediment movement. When fire sweeps through a landscape, burning the vegetation, the ground surface is prone to erosion, slides, etc. depending on the terrain. Increased carbon and sediment in water bodies is a concern because it can impact drinking water, infrastructure, and aquatic habitat. The retention of sediment and carbon by beaver dams can dampen potential impacts to drinking water and aquatic habitat. Immediately following a fire is the time when the most sediment enters rivers and creeks. Knowing that the sediments would travel down towards the river valleys, Sarah Dunn - a graduate student at Colorado State University - decided to study the impacts of the fires on the sediment retention in beaver ponds within and outside of burned areas to understand whether beaver ponds impact the ability of a watershed to recover after disturbance such as fire (Figure 1). The ability of a watershed to recover after a disturbance is known as watershed resilience.

Map of beaver pond locations.  Red dots denote sites located within a burned area and green dots denote beaver ponds in unburned locations.  The red polygon represents the area burned in the 2020 wildfires.
Figure 1: Map of beaver pond locations.  Red dots denote sites located within a burned area and green dots denote beaver ponds in unburned locations.  The red polygon represents the area burned in the 2020 wildfires.

Courtesy of Sarah Dunn

Research Study

To determine how beaver ponds affect the resilience of watersheds, Dunn set out to perform a research project to answer the following three questions: Do burned ponds store greater relative volumes of sediment compared to unburned ponds?, Do post-fire sedimentation rates in burned ponds exceed pre-fire and unburned sedimentation rates?, and Is post-fire sediment stored in beaver ponds coarser and have a higher abundance of organic carbon relative to pre-fire sediment? The rate and volume of sediment, carbon storage, and sediment grain size are expected to increase after a fire during the period when vegetation is recovering (Figure 2).

Conceptual diagram of sedimentation, grain size, and carbon storage related to hillslope vegetation in a beaver pond as a function of time since wildfire.
Figure 2: Conceptual diagram of sedimentation, grain size, and carbon storage related to hillslope vegetation in a beaver pond as a function of time since wildfire.

Courtesy of Sarah Dunn

Dunn used field, laboratory, and geospatial methods to answer these questions. During the field component of the project, 48 beaver ponds were surveyed. Ponds were located in both burned and unburned areas. In the field, surveys were conducted of the pond perimeters and sediment and water depths within the ponds. Dunn also collected sediment cores to identify charcoal within the layers of sediment that had been deposited. Laboratory analysis included measuring of total organic carbon and grain size of the pond sediment. Lastly, geospatial analysis was performed on the field and laboratory data.

Results

graph showing pre and post fire sedimentation rates
Figure 3: Comparison plot of sedimentation rate data from pre- and post-fire sediment. Rates from individual ponds are linked by the red lines. The post-fire plot sedimentation rates were significantly higher than pre-fire sedimentation rates

Courtesy of Sarah Dunn

For the beaver ponds that were sampled and analyzed for this research project, about half were located within a burned area and the other half located in an unburned area. The average sediment volume stored in the ponds was 796 m3 and sediment volumes ranged from 4 m3 (about half a dump truck load) to 7,888 m3 (about 500 dump trucks worth). Sarah determined that burned area beaver ponds stored higher relative volumes of sediment. The sedimentation rates after fires were significantly different from sedimentation rates before the fire (Figure 3). In fact, the sedimentation rates in ponds post-fire were an order of magnitude higher than pre-fire rates in ponds. In analyzing the grain size of sediments in burned and unburned beaver ponds, Sarah found that the grain size and amount of organic carbon did not differ significantly.

beaver pond at Moraine Park study site.
Figure 4: Picture of beaver pond at Moraine Park study site.

Courtesy of Sarah Dunn

Applications in the NPS

Beaver ponds, which once were abundant on the RMNP landscape and are now less common, drastically changing the hydrology of the environment. Beaver dams (Figure 4) create upstream ponds that store sediment and carbon. Due to the effects, mimicking beaver dams with structures is a strategy under consideration for fire-prone areas. The research that Sarah conducted provides evidence that beaver ponds effectively trap and retain post-fire sediment. The increased sediment in beaver ponds post-fire builds on the existing knowledge that beaver ponds provide to the ecosystem is evident through the increase of pooling water and decreased water flow (Figure 4). These findings contribute to the park’s efforts to restore beaver habitat.

woman with short hair wearing ball cap and pink shirt with trees and canyon in the background
Researcher Sarah Dunn.

Researchers

Sarah Dunn recently earned a Master's in Geoscience from Colorado State University. Growing up in Seattle, WA, exposed her to an abundance of water and a beaver-influenced landscape from a young age. Her subsequent work in water resources exposed her to many aspects of groundwater, water quality, and GIS. In graduate school, she became interested in understanding how rivers respond to and recover from disturbances. Sarah is grateful to have had to opportunity to work in Rocky Mountain National Park, and she extends thanks to the park staff for their support. Additionally, this work would not have been possible without her amazing advisor Dr. Sara Rathburn, and field assistant Jana Stich. After completing her Master of Science at Colorado State University, Sarah accepted a position with the United States Geological Survey.

Rocky Mountain National Park

Last updated: September 26, 2024