Last updated: July 23, 2024
Article
Bead Types at Fort Vancouver
![FOVA 1759 Small white and blue beads on strings.](/articles/images/1759.jpg?maxwidth=1300&maxheight=1300&autorotate=false)
NPS Photo, FOVA 1759
The museum collection at Fort Vancouver National Historic Site contains over 120,000 glass beads. Such a large and diverse assemblage poses a tremendous challenge to historical archaeologists studying the 19th century fur trade. Since 1970, analysts have made efforts to create a basic typology to understand the trade beads at Fort Vancouver. The beads have been categorized into over 160 individual varieties, in a multitude of colors and shapes.
Beads have an ancient history, demonstrated by their recovery from prehistoric archaeological sites of many cultures spanning the globe. Ancient Egyptians manufactured glass beads and Romans marketed glass beads widely throughout their empire. Glass trade beads are recovered from North American fur trade sites dating from the 16th to the early 20th century, stretching from the east coast of North America to Alaska.
Beads are one of the most common European items associated with the fur trade of North America. They were meant to function as an ornament, and there are numerous examples of beaded objects from North American fur trade cultures, ranging from clothing and storage bags, to horse tack and musket holsters. It is clear that most American Indian tribes who encountered glass beads incorporated them readily and valued them for many different reasons. As a result, beads acted as a form of currency at places like Fort Vancouver, where the Hudson's Bay Company (HBC) imported glass beads by the ton on an annual basis.
Historical evidence shows that the HBC imported beads from England, through several different suppliers who purchased the beads from a variety of manufacturers. It is likely that the majority of these beads were manufactured in Venice, Bohemia (now the Czech Republic), and China.
In this article, discover the four bead manufacturing methods used by bead makers in the 19th century, with examples from Fort Vancouver NHS's museum collection.
Beads have an ancient history, demonstrated by their recovery from prehistoric archaeological sites of many cultures spanning the globe. Ancient Egyptians manufactured glass beads and Romans marketed glass beads widely throughout their empire. Glass trade beads are recovered from North American fur trade sites dating from the 16th to the early 20th century, stretching from the east coast of North America to Alaska.
Beads are one of the most common European items associated with the fur trade of North America. They were meant to function as an ornament, and there are numerous examples of beaded objects from North American fur trade cultures, ranging from clothing and storage bags, to horse tack and musket holsters. It is clear that most American Indian tribes who encountered glass beads incorporated them readily and valued them for many different reasons. As a result, beads acted as a form of currency at places like Fort Vancouver, where the Hudson's Bay Company (HBC) imported glass beads by the ton on an annual basis.
Historical evidence shows that the HBC imported beads from England, through several different suppliers who purchased the beads from a variety of manufacturers. It is likely that the majority of these beads were manufactured in Venice, Bohemia (now the Czech Republic), and China.
In this article, discover the four bead manufacturing methods used by bead makers in the 19th century, with examples from Fort Vancouver NHS's museum collection.
![beaded moccasins Two leather moccasins decorated with a beaded floral pattern.](/articles/images/moccasins_2.jpg?maxwidth=1300&maxheight=1300&autorotate=false)
US National Museum of Natural History, Anthropology Department, Accession No. 51, U SNM No. E673-0, Smithsonian
Drawn Beads
During the 19th century, glass beads were manufactured in four primary ways. The most common type is known as "drawn." To make a drawn bead, a glass tube was created by heating a large hollow wand of glass and stretching (or drawing) the tube in opposite directions. As the wand stretched in length, the diameter shrank into an appropriate bead size. These tubes were then cut into three-foot lengths, sorted into similar diameters, and eventually cut with a chisel-like tool into individual beads. Typically, these beads were then placed into a heated drum and "hot tumbled" to remove their sharp edges. They could also be faceted with up to 20 individual facets ground onto their surfaces. Finally, drawn beads would be sieved to sort them into various size classes.
![FOVA 36606 End and side view of a cylindrical white bead.](/articles/images/36606.jpg?maxwidth=1300&maxheight=1300&autorotate=false)
NPS Photo, FOVA 36606
![36915 End and side views of a spherical bead, white with four blue stripes and a blue interior.](/articles/images/36915.jpg?maxwidth=1300&maxheight=1300&autorotate=false)
NPS Photo, FOVA 36915
![FOVA 52445 An assortment of spherical white beads, some with archaeological dirt in their center holes.](/articles/images/52445.jpg?maxwidth=1300&maxheight=1300&autorotate=false)
NPS Photo, FOVA 52445
![FOVA 36583 End and side view of a dark blue transparent bead.](/articles/images/36583.jpg?maxwidth=1300&maxheight=1300&autorotate=false)
NPS Photo, FOVA 36583
Wound Beads
The next most common bead manufacture type is known as "wound." Wound beads were created individually starting with a wire wand. The bead maker (often called a "lamp winder") would heat individual wands of glass with a lamp, and once molten, wind the glass around the wire wand. Different colors of glass could be used to create a polychrome, or multicolored, bead.
![FOVA 8864 End and side view of a bright yellow bead.](/articles/images/8864.jpg?maxwidth=1300&maxheight=1300&autorotate=false)
NPS Photo, FOVA 8864
![FOVA 36528, 36532 End and side views of two spherical blue beads.](/articles/images/36528.jpg?maxwidth=1300&maxheight=1300&autorotate=false)
NPS Photo, FOVA 36528, FOVA 36532
![FOVA 36508 End and side views of a ellipsoidal bead, white with orange and white stripes and a green decoration spiraling around it from end to end.](/articles/images/36508.jpg?maxwidth=1300&maxheight=1300&autorotate=false)
NPS Photo, FOVA 36508
Mandrel Pressed Beads
A less common manufacturing practice was molding beads with a two-part mold. The mold is also known as a mandrel press, producing "mandrel pressed beads." The mold had pins on either side of the mold to form the perforation. This perforation was often left partially filled with glass, and it was necessary to punch through the remnant when the glass had cooled. These beads were commonly faceted to complete their decoration.
![FOVA 29978 Three light blue spherical beads with many ground facets.](/articles/images/29978.jpg?maxwidth=1300&maxheight=1300&autorotate=false)
NPS Photo, FOVA 29978
![FOVA 15184 End and side view of a dark blue spherical bead with many ground facets.](/articles/images/15184.jpg?maxwidth=1300&maxheight=1300&autorotate=false)
NPS Photo, FOVA 15184
Blown Beads
Finally, the least common type of bead manufactured during the 19th century - and the least common in the Fort Vancouver NHS museum collection - are blown beads. These beads were formed by glass blowers, using a hollow iron rod upon which a mass, or "gather," of molten glass was formed. Air was blown into the rod; while this inflated gather of molten glass was on the rod, the blower would use tools to elongate, stretch, and decorate an individual bead. These beads have extremely thin walls, are very fragile, and quite rare.
![FOVA 10495 Side view of a delicate pink bead with a raised decoration.](/articles/images/10495.jpg?maxwidth=1300&maxheight=1300&autorotate=false)
NPS Photo, FOVA 10495
The HBC sold beads of all of these types by the "bunche," the pound, or by the yard. Bunche beads are assumed to be relatively large and expensive, whereas beads sold by the pound were likely small, and sorted into discrete sizes. Beads sold by the yard were strung in yard lengths and sold on strands. HBC records show that the beads were organized in these sales categories, then by color, such as, "Crystal," "White," "Amber," "Green Blue," "Blue Opaque," and "Lapis Blue." It is difficult to correlate these historical definitions with the archaeological samples of beads.
According to archaeologist Lester Ross (1976), the most common bead class cataloged at Fort Vancouver is hot tumbled drawn beads (97.6%), with the majority being plain, single, or double layer, in blue (60%) and white (10%). Wound beads account for just over 2% of the fort's assemblage, while mandrel pressed beads account for just 0.16%. Blown beads come in at a miniscule 0.0005% of the assemblage.
The last major analysis of Fort Vancouver beads was completed by Ross in 1990, when he published "Trade Beads from Hudson's Bay Company Fort Vancouver (1829-1860), Vancouver, Washington," in the journal Beads. In this article, he laid out a systematic classification system of the Fort Vancouver bead assemblage. Ross's system is based upon a modification of the system developed by Kenneth Kidd and Martha Kidd (1970), as modified and expanded by Karlis Karklins (1982, 1985).
Ross' article is still the de facto resource for archaeologists when analyzing newly recovered beads at Fort Vancouver. However, the Fort Vancouver NHS Cultural Resources Division created a quick reference guide with large color images to not only enhance our students' and volunteers' ability to analyze beads, but also to offer other interested individuals an aesthetic look at these beautiful objects.
According to archaeologist Lester Ross (1976), the most common bead class cataloged at Fort Vancouver is hot tumbled drawn beads (97.6%), with the majority being plain, single, or double layer, in blue (60%) and white (10%). Wound beads account for just over 2% of the fort's assemblage, while mandrel pressed beads account for just 0.16%. Blown beads come in at a miniscule 0.0005% of the assemblage.
The last major analysis of Fort Vancouver beads was completed by Ross in 1990, when he published "Trade Beads from Hudson's Bay Company Fort Vancouver (1829-1860), Vancouver, Washington," in the journal Beads. In this article, he laid out a systematic classification system of the Fort Vancouver bead assemblage. Ross's system is based upon a modification of the system developed by Kenneth Kidd and Martha Kidd (1970), as modified and expanded by Karlis Karklins (1982, 1985).
Ross' article is still the de facto resource for archaeologists when analyzing newly recovered beads at Fort Vancouver. However, the Fort Vancouver NHS Cultural Resources Division created a quick reference guide with large color images to not only enhance our students' and volunteers' ability to analyze beads, but also to offer other interested individuals an aesthetic look at these beautiful objects.
Click here to download the Fort Vancouver Bead Guide.
Tags
- fort vancouver national historic site
- archaeology
- archeology
- beads
- beading
- beadwork
- bead making
- archaeological artifacts
- archaeological site
- archeological artifacts
- archeological
- archeology guide
- archeology reference manual
- archeology resource manual
- archeological sites
- fort vancouver
- fort vancouver nhs
- fur trade
- fort
- forts
- 19th century
- trade
- artifact