On-line Book



Book Cover
Fauna Series No. 4


MENU

Cover

Contents

Foreword

Introduction

Population and Mortality

Habits

Food

Elk

Deer

Antelope

Bighorn

Other Larger Mammals

Small Mammals

Birds

Misc. Diet

Conclusions

Bibliography





Fauna of the National Parks — No. 4
Ecology of the Coyote in the Yellowstone
National Park Service Arrowhead


CHAPTER VI:
MULE DEER IN RELATION TO COYOTES


LOSS OF FAWNS

Losses during winter of 1937—38.—The latest large counts for the different range units have been placed in one table for convenience. See page 72. Most of these counts were made in April, many late in that month. Limited fawn losses probably occurred after some of these counts were made, but on the whole the figures for the fawns are close to the proportion that came through the winter. Since these counts probably represent about 75 per cent of the population, the numbers of fawns and does in the counts are not far from the actual numbers on the ranges.

The total of the late counts made over the main range units is 485 does, 174 fawns, 136 bucks, and 41 deer unidentified. The fawn-doe ratio in these counts is 35 percent. The percentage increase over the doe and buck populations combined is 28 percent. It is known that relatively fewer bucks than does are counted, so to be really conservative the number of bucks might be doubled. Then the increase in the herd due to the fawn crop becomes about 22 percent. This includes the population along the Yellowstone River where scarcely any fawns survived, so it appears that there was a healthy increase in the deer population as a whole, even though the winter over part of the range was more severe than usual.

Since large counts of deer were not secured when they first came to the winter range and therefore some mortality had already occurred when the first extensive counts were made in January, figures are not available which would give a good clue to the actual loss of fawns during the winter. Counts made in January (one) and in February total 355 does and 176 fawns for Reese Creek, the Game Ranch, along Gardiner River and Lava Creek, below Deckers Flat, between Deckers Flat and Blacktail Deer Creek, and between Blacktail Deer Creek and Little Cottonwood Creek. Counts made in March (one) and in April on the same ranges total 424 does and 148 fawns. If the early fawn ratio was true for the whole population, then the April count shows a loss of 62 fawns or 29 percent of the fawns since February. There was, of course, considerable loss previous to the February counts, especially on the Yellowstone River range. There fore the actual winter loss of fawns was much higher than 29 percent, being almost 100 percent along the Yellowstone River.

deer
Figure 25— The two fawns on the left side are feeding on greasewood (Sarcobatus).
Much of the heavily browsed sagebrush has been killed.
Slope near Gardiner River, March 25, 1938.

Fawn mortality higher than doe mortality.—In practically all of the areas there was a downward trend in the ratio of fawns to does. Where the mortality was not so heavy this differential mortality was not great, but along the Yellowstone River, where the mortality was drastic, the ratio dropped almost to zero.

Fawn—Doe Ratio, Winter of 1937—38

Locality Early count Late count
DateRatioDateRatio

Reese Creek
Game Ranch
Gardiner River-Lava Creek
Below Deckers Flat
Deckers Flat-Blacktail Creek
Blacktail-Little Cottonwood Creek

Feb. 20
Feb. 21
Feb. 22
Jan. 25
Feb. 4
Jan. 25
Percent
60
56
53
78
46
83

Apr. 20
Apr. 28
Apr. 21
Mar. 21
Mar. 21
Apr. 26
Percent
43
41
38
37
20
3

Fawn mortality correlated with winter range conditions.—The Reese Creek, Game Ranch, and Gardiner River-Lava Creek winter ranges, and that below Deckers Flat, are not very different in quality, but the first named is the best of the three, being the least overbrowsed. The Game Ranch range I would rate as slightly superior to the Gardiner River-Lava Creek range because of the greater availability of Douglas fir browse, and the range below Deckers Flat is similar to the others in quality. The differences between these ranges are hardly large enough to expect a corresponding difference in fawn survival, but the last deer counts on three of these ranges showed a correlation of range quality and fawn survival, the ratios being 42 percent for Reese Creek, 41 percent for the Game Ranch, and 38 percent for the Gardiner River-Lava Creek area. The range below Deckers Flat had a fawn—doe ratio of 60 percent but this was higher than usual because of a low count of does so that 47 percent is probably a much better figure. The differences in the fawn ratios are too small to be of any significance. What is significant is the similarity of fawn survival on these rather similar ranges.

The range along the Yellowstone River above Deckers Flat was a strikingly inferior and less favorable winter range than the previously mentioned four ranges, because of severe overbrowsing, scattered distribution of food plants, and especially crusted snow. On the section between Deckers Flat and Blacktail Deer Creek a rather small count made on March 21 showed a 2-percent faw-doe ratio and as some mortality resulted after this date, survival on this range was undoubtedly very low.

On the section of this range between Blacktail Deer Creek and Little Cottonwood Creek 72 does and 11 fawns were counted on February 16, 88 does and 13 fawns on March 5, and 63 does and 2 fawns on April 26. The survival of fawns on this range was almost nil. Apparently a good fawn crop arrived on this range but heavy losses commenced in January. Between Hellroaring and Tower Falls, a range covered with crusted snow, the survival of fawns was also low. On April 2, I counted 9 does and 1 fawn, the latter appearing to be very weak. The correlation of the fawn survival and condition of the winter ranges was very pronounced in the winter of 1937—38.

Losses during winter of 1938—39.—In the fall of 1938 deer were observed between November 11 and November 23 but during this period only a few of the deer had returned to the winter range so the counts were not entirely representative. The following counts suggest that a fairly large proportion of fawns arrived on the winter range. The faw-doe ratio of the total number recorded is 83.

DateLocationDoeFawnBuckTotal
Nov. 12
Nov. 13
Nov. 15
Nov. 22
Game Ranch
Undine Falls
Gardiner River
Terrace Hot Springs

     Total
3
2
11
21
37
3
4
8
16
31
2
2
3
8
15
8
8
22
45
83

In the spring of 1939 the following deer counts were made but the samples were too small to give the full picture:

DateLocationDoeFawn BuckTotal
Feb. 26
Feb. 27
  Do.
Feb. 28
Mar. 3
  Do.
Mar. 5
  Do.
Gardiner River-Lava Creek
Mount Everts
Lower Gardiner River
Reese Creek
Checking Station
Tower Falls
Deckers Flat
Hellroaring to Deckers Flat

     Total
75
6
7
45
3
9
36
38
219
14
5
2
17
2
7
9
3
59
6
3
0
...
...
...
1
17
27
95
14
9
62
5
16
46
58
305

The fawn-doe ratio of all counts combined is 26, a lower ratio than existed during the winter of 1937—38. The figures are too incomplete to make detailed comparisons with those of the previous winter. Fawn survival apparently was extremely low in the winter of 1938—39 along the Yellowstone River from Hellroaring to Deckers Flat, just as it was in the winter of 1937—38. The fawn-doe ratios on the other ranges, except at Tower Falls, were lower in the winter of 1938—39 than in the previous year although more complete counts might have shown less difference. In 1938—39 there was more snow over parts of the deer ranges in the Reese Creek, Game Ranch, and Gardiner River sections. This additional snow, along with continued deterioration of the range, may have been a factor in the apparent lower fawn survival that winter over the above-named deer ranges, but more complete counts and closer observation would be necessary for certainty.

Along the Gardiner River on February 26, 1939, I noted two carcasses of deer, one cleaned and the other partly eaten by four coyotes. One carcass was that of an old buck, the other of an old doe with teeth worn to the gums. Ranger Grimm found remains of three adult bucks in the Reese Creek area which apparently had died from wounds received during the hunting season. No bucks were seen on Reese Creek near the edge of the park adjacent to the area where considerable hunting took place the previous fall. The apparent scarcity of bucks in this region may be due to this drain.

On March 5, 1939, hair remains of two deer were found near Blacktail Deer Creek and Crevice Creek and the mandible of a fawn below Crevice Creek. The general impression received in walking from Hellroaring Creek to Gardiner along the Yellowstone River was that deer were as numerous as during the winter of 1937—38. They occupied a somewhat wider range, being found near Hellroaring cabin where they were not found in the winter of 1937—38. The fawn increase in 1939 is apparently sufficiently large to maintain or possibly increase the deer population in the park.

Fawns killed by coyotes on the winter range.—Although healthy adult deer do not seem to be subject to coyote predation, it appears that fawns are occasionally killed by coyotes on the winter range. Tracks in the snow near fawn remains indicated in several instances that the fawns had been killed by coyotes. Since our knowledge of the circumstances under which prey is killed by predators is scant, it seems desirable to give the evidence found at carcasses which showed indications that coyotes had made the kill.

deer
Figure 26— Cedar with low branches heavily browsed.
The deer, a cripple, was left behind while 5 others ran at observer's approach.
Gardiner River, January 16, 1938.

     1938

January 26 . . .

At Crevice Lake some ravens were seen circling over a spot high up on a steep slope. As I neared the spot two coyotes ran off, one of them carrying a piece of hide. The stomach, a lower mandible, hair, and a few pieces of hide were all that remained of a fawn carcass. On some ledges just above tbe beginning of a 300-yard trail made by the sliding carcass were four deer beds. Tracks showed that the fawn had made two jumps from its bed down the precipitous slope, and had fallen on the third jump and started its slide from which it never rose. Above the deer beds were a few coyote tracks. It seemed probable that coyotes had startled the deer and that the fawn had been attacked by coyotes after it had slid down the steep slope. This fawn may have fallen because it was weak, and possibly it was unable to rise after sliding down even before the coyotes finished it.

A short distance below Crevice Lake along the trail I found the remains of a fawn that had been killed recently. Two leg bones, a shoulder blade, an innominate bone, a few pieces of skin, and the stomach contents were all that were left; the flesh had been completely eaten. Just above the remains were fresh tracks of four deer which had been jumping down the hillside. It seemed probable that the dead fawn bad been one of the jumping deer.

January 28 . . .

Along the Yellowstone River about a half mile below the mouth of Lamar Creek, a little after noon, my attention was attracted by some ravens flying in small circles over scattered Douglas firs. As some of the ravens were alighting, it was apparent that they were at a carcass. Coming over the last ridge, I saw five coyotes run away from the carcass in different directions. They had been feeding on a male fawn deer, having eaten most of the hind quarters, the meat off the mandibles, and the ribs on one side. The fawn had been killed but a few hours previously for it was not frozen and still steamed a little. The tracks on the slope above the carcass showed that before the fawn had fallen it had been jumping in a zigzag course. For a distance of 100 yards on the back trail of the deer, a little blood appeared in places. Apparently the coyotes had been chasing the deer but there were so many tracks in the snow that I could not determine how the coyotes had maneuvered. The fawn had been running down hill before falling. About 400 yards from the dead fawn there were four adult deer feeding unconcernedly on the open slope.

January 29 . . .

At the mouth of Cottonwood Creek I saw where three or four deer had been jumping down a steep slope. Parallel to the deer tracks were coyote tracks, so it seemed that coyotes had been chasing the deer. One of the latter, a fawn, had fallen and had been dragged down the slope several yards and eaten. Little remained but some hair and the entrails.

About one-fourth of a mile below the mouth of Cottonwood Creek were hair and stomach remains of another fawn. Coming off the hillside immediately above the fawn were tracks of four jumping deer. Possibly the deer had been chased and the fawn had fallen.

February 13 . . .

Below Undine Falls along the Creek I found hair and stomach remains of a fawn that had died the day before. The snow had been tracked up by the coyotes and short trails led off to spots where the animals had brought pieces of the carcass to eat. The tracks indicated that the deer had been chased by four or five coyotes. On an open flat 30 yards above the remains were some bunches of deer hair and the area was tracked up as though the deer had been brought to bay. The drifting snow had covered the tracks too much to be sure of what had taken place. From this spot the deer had jumped toward the creek and descended an almost perpendicular bank, more than 20 feet high, which was one side of a short narrow draw. The deer had fallen at the base of the bank, and here it had been devoured.

February 15 . . .

Along the Yellowstone River below the mouth of Crevice Creek in a shallow ravine I found the carcass of a female fawn that had probably been dead only a few hours. The carcass was still limp although the temperature was about 20° below zero. Most of one side, including front and hind quarters, part of the intestines, and the heart and liver had been eaten. The coyotes apparently had eaten their fill, for on the fresh snow could be seen where they had been rolling and cleaning their muzzles and throats. There was not a trace of fat on the carcass, not even around the intestines. The animal had not been ham strung. There was a deep bite near the base of the neck, which had chipped part of a dorsal process of a vertebra. The tracks indicated that three coyotes had chased the fawn down a steep slope of jumbled boulders covered with a light fall of loose snow. One track followed that of the fawn, the other two were 6 or 7 yards to one side. I was able to back track the chase only about 60 yards to an area where elk and deer tracks were too numerous to permit further tracking. The fawn had been making 10- and 11-foot jumps. On a large boulder with a drop of 10 feet below it, the fawn had fallen as it struck, judging from the marks in the snow and the hair hanging on the gooseberry branches spreading over the rock. Below the rock the fawn had made five more jumps before falling. From here the carcass had been dragged over the rocks a dozen yards to the place where I found it. Lack of any fat on the animal suggests a weak fawn. On March 4 the carcass was still untouched by coyotes, probably because I had handled it considerably, but it was eaten later.

February 18 . . .

On a slope of Mount Everts a little below Undine Falls late in the afternoon I saw two ravens circling over a draw and then lighting on a tree in the area over which they had circled. Their actions indicated that a carcass lay in the draw so I followed a ridge leading to it. In the ravine to one side of me I caught a glimpse of two coyotes also traveling toward the spot pointed out by the ravens. Later these two coyotes got my scent and ran up a ridge above the carcass where they joined two others, one of which seemed to be leaving. One of the coyotes picked up the leg of a deer lying on the ridge but dropped it when another approached with arched back, lowered head, and wide open snarling mouth. A third coyote then picked up the leg and started up the ridge unmolested. Either the second coyote was interceding for the third one, or else the lordship of the third one was recognized by the others. In the ravine I found a fawn partially eaten. The carcass had slid from near the top of Mount Everts, several hundred yards down a precipitous draw filled with hard packed drifted snow. In one place where the carcass had struck some cedars bordering the draw, branches 1 inch in diameter had been broken by the impact. There were too many tracks to decipher what had taken place but it is probable that the fawn had been chased toward the draw, lost its footing, and then taken the long slide. It undoubtedly was unable to rise when it stopped sliding because of the injuries it must have received en route. There were coyote tracks above the steep gully and all the way down to the carcass. Two nosefly larvae were found in the nasal passages. Since the gular pouch and adjacent parts had been exposed, possibly most of the larvae had been eaten by magpies. The fawn was in poor condition for there was not a trace of fat, not even on the mesenteries. The stomach contents consisted of about 99 percent Douglas fir needles and twigs.

February 20 . . .

The following incident brings out several points so I will tell it in full even though there is some doubt that a coyote did the killing. About 10 p. m. a resident of Gardiner knocked at my door. I opened it, and was confronted by a tragic face and a breast bursting with righteous indignation. He asked if I was the man studying the coyote. "Well," he said, "I just wanted to tell you that a deer, still warm, is on the Mammoth Road near the upper bridge, which the coyotes have killed. If the coyotes act that way, I don't think much of them."

I thanked him for the information without offering any comments on the morals or amorals of the coyote and told him how happy I was to know about the deer for I wanted all possible information on coyote predation, and that I would investigate. I drove toward Mammoth and found the fresh carcass along the road and saw a coyote cross the road near it. The carcass was half eaten and the heart, lungs, and liver were missing, but the head was intact. I examined the carcass in my cabin. There was no fat on the animal. In the gular pouch, frontal sinuses, and nasal passages I found 104 botfly larvae, most of which were about 1 inch long. The nasal passages were packed with the larvae so that it was difficult to see how the animal managed to breathe. If the coyotes had killed this deer, they had eliminated an animal which unquestionably was unfit. There is a possibility that the fawn had been hit by a car, although I saw nothing that looked like bruises on the parts of the carcass available for examination. In any event this deer was in such poor condition that it would have been easy prey for the coyotes. I saved the larvae which filled a small olive jar and showed them to my informant, who had not realized that animals in Nature could be so afflicted.

Continued >>>








top of page Top





Last Modified: Thurs, Dec 20 2001 10:00:00 pm PDT
http://www.cr.nps.gov/history/online_books/fauna4/fauna6d.htm

National Park Service's ParkNet Home