On-line Book



Book Cover
Fauna Series No. 4


MENU

Cover

Contents

Foreword

Introduction

Population and Mortality

Habits

Food

Elk

Deer

Antelope

Bighorn

Other Larger Mammals

Small Mammals

Birds

Misc. Diet

Conclusions

Bibliography





Fauna of the National Parks — No. 4
Ecology of the Coyote in the Yellowstone
National Park Service Arrowhead


CHAPTER VII:
ANTELOPE IN RELATION TO COYOTES


STATUS OF ANTELOPE

The antelope in Yellowstone National Park have had protection for many years. The size of the population has undoubtedly been largely limited by the winter range. Poaching, still a factor when antelope leave the park, was no doubt important in earlier times. Bailey (1930, p. 30) states:

In 1908 about 2,000 were estimated in the park but during the following winter all but 25 escaped through the park fence below Gardiner and went down to the lower valleys, where at that time they were unprotected, and many never returned. In 1911 only 450 were counted in the park. In 1914, 600 were estimated in the park herd, and in 1916, 500. In the spring of 1917 most of these left the park and later, when driven back, only about 200 were accounted for.

Antelope counts made by rangers, 1934—38

YearActual CountEstimate YearActual CountEstimate
19343217001937600627
19354197501938786800
1936406603

Although the antelope have prospered and increased during the last few years, as shown by the foregoing censuses and by the fawn counts made during the last 2 years, their future is nevertheless precarious because of the deplorable state of their winter forage within the park. As is so often the case, the crux of the problem is the winter range. Good antelope range exists outside the park boundaries, which the antelope have begun to utilize, but unless this range becomes public property there is no assurance that it will be available in the future. So the solution of the antelope problem involves more winter range, with perhaps fewer elk on it.

The present area now being used outside the park, together with considerable additional range farther north, should be set aside for antelope. If the antelope are to be confined to the winter range within the park there will undoubtedly be a drastic decrease in their numbers. The coyote is not at the present time adversely affecting the antelope, nor is it preventing them from increasing, even though the herd is existing on a much over-utilized winter range.








top of page Top





Last Modified: Thurs, Dec 20 2001 10:00:00 pm PDT
http://www.cr.nps.gov/history/online_books/fauna4/fauna7e.htm

National Park Service's ParkNet Home