|
|
||||||||||
The original of the Bixby letter apparently has been lost. It has been alleged that this famous letter was not written by Lincoln. Recently, a certain distinguished American educator stated that he was told in 1912 by Lord Morley that John Hay, one of Lincoln's private secretaries, told him in 1905 that he wrote the letter. Lincoln scholars remain unconvinced. It is pointed out that the Bixby letter shows all the qualities of Lincoln's literary style. Regardless of the dispute that has developed over the authorship of this letter, it is given below as a Lincoln document. As a message of condolence it is generally considered unsurpassed.
Lincoln wrote over 30 letters to General Hooker. One has become so famous that it is commonly known as "The Hooker Letter." It notified Hooker that he had been given command of the Army of the Potomac, replacing Burnside,following the latter's calamitous defeat at the Battle of Fredericksburg. In November 1941, this letter sold for $15,000 at a Philadelphia auction. In 1924 it had sold for $10,000. Although a masterpiece of English composition, that alone would not have given it its great value. The unique quality of this remarkable letter lies in the fact that it is a magnificent character sketch of the writer himself. -In it Lincoln's frankness, integrity, magnanimity, and his paramount concern for the success of the Army and the preservation of the Nation are fully revealed. Hooker himself apparently was visibly touched by the letter. Shortly after receiving it he discussed it one evening with Noah Brooks who reports that Hooker said," That is just such a letter as a father might write to his son. It is a beautiful letter, and, although I think he was harder on me than I deserved, I will say that I love the man who wrote it." General: I have placed you at the head of the Army of the Potomac. Of course I have done this upon what appear to me to be sufficient reasons, and yet I think it best for you to know that there are some things in regard to which I am not quite satisfied with you. I believe you to be a brave and skilful soldier, which of course I like. I also believe you do not mix politics with your profession, in which you are right. You have confidence in yourself, which is a valuable if not an indispensable quality. You are ambitious, which, within reasonable bounds, does good rather than harm; but I think that during General Burnside's command of the army you have taken counsel of your ambition and thwarted him as much as you could, in which you did a great wrong to the country and to a most meritorious and honorable brother officer. I have heard, in such a way as to believe it. of your recently saying that both the army and the government needed a dictator. Of course it was not for this, but in spite of it, that I have given you the command. Only those generals who gain successes can set up dictators. What I now ask of you is military success, and I will risk the dictatorship. The government will support you to the utmost of its ability, which is neither more nor less than it has done and will do for all commanders. I much fear that the spirit which you have aided to infuse into the army, of criticizing their commander and withholding confidence from him, will now turn upon you. I shall assist you as far as I can to put t down. Neither you nor Napoleon, if he were alive again, could get any good out of an army while such a spirit prevails in it; and now beware of rashness. Beware of rashness, but with energy and sleepless vigilance go forward and give us victories. LINCOLN TO HOOKER, JANUARY 26, 1863.
General Grant's account of his first private interview with President Lincoln, on the occasion in the early spring of 1864 when he was given command of all the Federal armies, explains many of the reasons for Lincoln's interference in military matters, for which he has been severely criticised. At last Lincoln had found the man who would accept the responsibility and bring final victory.
| |||||||||||
![]() |
|