Analysis and Evaluation Buildings and Structures Pre-war Chamorro houses in Asan and Agat were wood and thatch construction. Only about a fourth of the homes had a cement foundation. Very few homes were "built of masonry with corrugated sheet-iron roofs" (Jennison-Nolan 1979). Pre-War bombing, invasion, and occupation episodes eliminated almost all pre-war buildings and structures throughout Guam, and especially at the Asan and Agat beach units. The only structures remaining on the landscape are associated with the war. These are predominantly defensive structures built by the Japanese. Defense Structures When war looked imminent, the Japanese realized that they needed to plan a strategy and build defense structures. The decision to reinforce their position on the island had come so late (March 1944) that they had less than three months to prepare. General Takashina and his subordinates felt that between the lack of Japanese troops available, and the limited time period given to them for preparation, their situation was hopeless. Nevertheless, they began to build with the forced labor of the Chamorro people. There were critical shortages of cement, reinforcing steel, lumber, and a wide range of needed hardware, which limited the kinds of fortification that could be built (Gailey 1988:40). The defense structures included pillboxes, cave bunkers, tunnels, and gun emplacements. These structures varied from well-built concrete faced enclosures with multiple gun openings to crude and hurried concrete caps on holes dug in the dirt. All of the structures within the Asan and Agat beach units take advantage of the natural terrain. Most structures are found in the five coastal outcrops that provided natural caves and crevices. These were enlarged and made to connect through a series of tunnels. Reinforced concrete and/or stone walls were added for support and cover the gun bases mounted inside. Heavy combat obliterated many of these defense structures, however many still remain within Asan and Agat beach areas. Very few structures were built upon the beaches. Only one remains offshore of Asan Beach, possibly discarded when American troops began organizing the beaches as supply bases. Some ingenious features or design techniques were added to structures. Some pillbox/caves had interior passages that extended from shoreline to ridge top. These were advantageous for attacking the first wave of American troops coming from ship to shore. Then, the Japanese would retreat through the caves up to the ridge top. After the cave appeared to be abandoned, and American troops felt secure ashore, the Japanese could return to the lower position and attack from behind. One pillbox was found to have a grenade-proof air vent that diverted any grenade through a shoot to deposit it outside of the pillbox. Other structures, clearly seen from troops advancing towards the shore, were thought to have been deliberately obvious to distract attention away from well-camouflaged strongholds. Many of the historic Japanese defense structures built in 1944 are in a state of deterioration from various factors including weather, erosion, vegetation, visitation, vandalism, structural deterioration, or inappropriate maintenance techniques. Vegetative root systems cause expansive pressure on cement structures and can cause the disconnection between stone and mortar. The cracks created from roots allow for water to penetrate into structures resulting in the leaching of limestone compromising strength and integrity of the structure. Structural assessments of these structures were recorded in three NPS reports: The List of Classified Structures (LCS) 1978-2000, the Emergency Super-Typhoon PAKA Report 1998, WAPA Historic Structure Storm Damage:1998, and the Cultural Resource Assessment of Historic WWII Sites 2003. As an aggregate, all of the structures contribute to the historic character of the cultural landscape. However, some structures lack individual physical integrity, or have been modified in a manner that effects integrity (such as the use of steel material for structural reinforcements because of roofs caving in). These structures are listed within the Archeological Section of this document. The remaining structures that retain integrity are listed in this section and remain a contributing feature to this historic scene. Asan Beach Unit from Asan Point to Adelup Point Adelup Point (LCS 042) Japanese Tunnel at Asan Point Ridgeline (LCS 106) 1961 Mabini Monument (LCS 045) 1964 Mabini Monument (LCS 052) 3rd Marine Division Association Monument (LCS MRKR1) War in the Pacific Park Plaque (LCS MRKR2) U.S. Landing Monument (LCS MRKR3) Civilian Landing Memorial (LCS MRKR4) Liberator's Memorial (Not on LCS) These monuments, plaques, and memorials listed above were built after the period of significance and are therefore non-contributing to the historic landscape. Agat Beach from Bangi Point to Apaca Point, including Ga'an Point Apaca Point Japanese Bunker with Tunnel (LCS 001) Apaca Point Japanese Bunker (LCS 002) Apaca Point Japanese Tunnel (LCS 103) Agat Japanese Cave (LCS 004) Rizal Point Japanese Bunker (LCS 005) Ga'an Point Latrine Foundation (LCS 007) Bangi Point Japanese Pillbox (LCS 10) Agat Beach Monument (not on LCS) U.S. Landing Monument (not on LCS) Summary Initial intents of commemorative monuments were to be separate from the actual historical park. As stated in the 1967 master plan proposal to Congress, for the War in the Pacific National Park: "There is no conflict between the proposal for a memorial, which would involve a site in Agana, near the Government House, and the historical park, which would involve lands primarily at Asan and Agat" (DOI 1967:1). Today, these monuments associated with the Asan and Agat beach landscapes do commemorate the events, but they are not from the period of significance, and are therefore noncontributing features of the cultural landscape. Sixty years after the liberation of Guam, battlefield structures remain within the Asan and Agat beach units. Although all of the structures listed in this section have undergone weathering since the 1940's, they are still considered to have integrity and are significant and contributing to the historic scene of the War in the Pacific National Historical Park.
wapa/cri/part3a2.htm Last Updated: 03-may-2004 |