You are viewing ARCHIVED contentThis content was published online before January 20, 2025. Please note that this content is NOT UPDATED, and links may not work. For current information, visit https://www.nps.gov/aboutus/news/index.htm.
News Release Date: June 8, 2016
The purpose of the plan is to guide management actions by the NPS to restore and conserve the native species diversity and ecological function of selected high elevation aquatic ecosystems that have been adversely impacted by human activities and to increase the resistance and resilience of native species and ecosystems to human-induced modifications to the environment. Under alternative B of the Restoration Plan/FEIS, the NPS would employ physical treatment where feasible (gill netting, electrofishing, trapping, disturbing redds (fish egg nests), and/or temporarily covering spawning habitat with boulders) and piscicide treatment (the use of rotenone) for waterbodies determined infeasible for physical treatment. Physical treatment would be applied in approximately 52 waterbodies (27 lakes, 24 ponds, 1 marsh) and 15 miles of streams in 17 basins. Piscicide treatment would be applied in approximately 33 waterbodies (4 lakes, 25 ponds, and 4 marshes) and 16 miles of streams in 9 basins. The number of waterbodies and stream miles identified for treatment represents the maximum number of waterbodies to be treated under alternative B. If alternative B is selected, the plan would be implemented over the next 25-35 years—and piscicide treatments would not start until 2017 or 2018. After all treatments are completed, self-sustaining non-native trout populations would continue to exist in the parks in 465 waterbodies (221 lakes, 186 ponds, 58 marshes) and in hundreds of miles of streams.
The Restoration Plan/Draft EIS was available for public review from September 26, 2013, to December 17, 2013. The NPS received 123 public comment letters: from individuals, interest groups, businesses, and government agencies. In response to public comments, agency feedback, and new technical information, the preferred alternative (alternative B) changed slightly between the release of the draft plan and the final plan.
Background Information:
The Restoration Plan/FEIS analyzes a range of management alternatives for the restoration and conservation of high elevation aquatic ecosystems within Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks. Non-native fish have severely reduced native biological diversity and disrupted ecological function in the high elevation aquatic ecosystems within SEKI. From 1870 to 1988, several species of non-native trout, including golden, rainbow, golden x rainbow hybrid, brook, and brown trout, were introduced into many previously fishless waterbodies throughout SEKI. Surveys conducted from 1997 to 2002 determined that self-sustaining non-native trout populations had become established in 575 lakes, ponds, and marshes, plus connecting streams, and nearly all streams that drain these sites from high to low elevations. Many studies conducted in SEKI and elsewhere in the Sierra Nevada analyzed the effects that non-native trout have on native species and ecosystems. These studies consistently document that the widespread introduction and continued presence of non-native trout have caused substantial impacts to native species and ecosystems.
Two species of mountain yellow-legged frogs (Rana muscosa and Rana sierrae) (MYLFs) have been particularly vulnerable to the impacts of non-native fish stocking. These species are integral components of SEKI's high elevation aquatic ecosystems. Non-native trout plus the spread of the amphibian chytrid fungus are the primary factors that have caused formerly abundant MYLFs to disappear from more than 92% of historic sites in the Sierra Nevada, with similarly large losses in SEKI. Most of the remaining MYLF populations are small, isolated, often restricted to small ponds vulnerable to drying, and diseased –with low survival and recruitment rates. As a result, in April 2014, both species were listed as endangered under the federal Endangered Species Act. Intervention is urgently needed to prevent the extirpation of both MYLF species from the parks.
–NPS –
|
Last updated: June 8, 2016