"Accepted practices of
historic preservation provide the theoretical foundation for the guidelines."
Noré V. Winter, Developing Design Guidelines for Historic Districts, 1993
A firm foundation. The work we do today
in our historic neighborhoods and on local landmarks is firmly connected
to accepted historic preservation principles and practices of 19th century
Europe. From the past, we inherit the idea of a hierarchy for work, from
the "least intervention to the greatest." These are a few of
the well-known ideas. We "maintain rather than repair." We "repair
rather than replace." We "preserve rather than restore."
We "restore rather than reconstruct."
Development of Federal Standards in the '70s.
Based on accepted principles and practices, the National Park Service
created The Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Historic Preservation
Projects. This document contained general Standards for all projects and
specific Standards for acquisition, protection, stabilization, preservation,
rehabilitation, restoration, and reconstruction. The early Standards were
used to measure the appropriateness of project work where federal grant-in-aid
funds were sought. Also in the 70s, the Standards for Rehabilitation were singled out as requirements for a brand new federal program that
offered a 20% tax credit for certified rehabilitation work—the Federal
Preservation Tax Incentives Program. By adopting the Standards in regulation,
the federal government made them requirements for those programs.
Ongoing use in the '80s and '90s. During
two decades of ongoing use within the NPS' Federal Preservation Tax Incentives
and Grant-in-Aid Programs, the Secretary's Standards were updated with
public input to keep pace with the times. The Standards for Rehabilitation
were revised in 1990 through their adoption in regulation (36 CFR 67)
for the Tax Incentives Program. The Secretary of the Interior's Standards
for Historic Preservation Projects were revised in 1983 and again 1992,
when they were re-named The Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties through their adoption in regulation
as 36 CFR 68. They remain in use today within the HPF Grant-in-Aid Program.
Into the 2000s. Without a doubt, Rehabilitation
is the most frequently applied approach to work in our nation's communities
today and the Federal Preservation Tax Incentives Program is as popular
as ever. But the Standards for Rehabilitation have tended to overshadow
the more inclusive conceptual package, The Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties. The Standards for Rehabilitation are often applied
where the project goal is Preservation or Restoration. If a historic district
applies work other than Rehabilitation—in particular, Restoration—then
other Standards should be considered, adopted, and applied as well. Read
on to learn more about the basic differences between the four treatments
and the importance of choosing the best approach for work in your historic
district or on a local landmark!
---------------------------------
HOME
|