Part II RESOURCE MANAGEMENT POLICY DISCUSSION The historical parks and monuments have been established to commemorate specific cultural eras, historical events, or persons representing the outstanding cultural landmarks in the development of this Nation. In each case the commemoration is of a specific time, or span of time, as well as of the event or person involved. The evolution of this Nation and its indigenous cultures has been determined by the natural resources that it contains, as well as by the ideas and ideals of its citizens. Then, as now, the natural resources were integral elements of the historic scene. While the interpretive theme of a historic area may be associated with man, a proper presentation cannot be made out of context with the total environment. This is not to imply, however, that the environments of all historical areas should be treated precisely like natural areas. Although many archeological and other historical areas, such as Theodore Roosevelt National Memorial Park and Fort Jefferson National Monument, contain prime natural values, most historical areas contain artificial environments, such as farms, pastures, wood lots, and lawns that require intensive management. These should be restored and maintained when restoration is necessary for proper visitor understanding of the historic scene and the restoration is otherwise practicable. It is not acceptable to post an interpretive sign in a mature second growth forest proclaiming "At the time of the battle this was an open field." Nor should interpretation rely on the visitor's empathy to determine what a cornfield would look like where today stands a carefully mowed lawn. To the extent feasible, the same degree of attention should be given to the historical integrity of external environments as is given to historical structures. Presentation of the parade ground at Morristown, for example, should be as authentic as the presentation of the interior of the Andrew Johnson Home. Naturally, care must be taken to avoid recreating conditions that lead to severe erosion and other landscape catastrophies. In extensive land or land and water areas, the ecosystem concept of park management must be applied in historical areas. Some of the ecosystems will be complex mixtures of natural and artificial environments and may tax existing knowledge and abilities to the utmost. But by accepting the challenge as the archeologists have done in their interdisciplinary approach at Mesa Verde, the Service can provide the leadership and technical assistance necessary in the historic preservation movement.
Natural Resources Management Exotic Plants and Animals Landscape Management
Land Acquisition To implement this administrative policy with a minimum of inconvenience to private owners involved, the following procedures have been developed: I. In newly authorized areas (usually those authorized since 1961) where federally owned lands are limited and privately owned lands are extensive, the priority of acquisition is as follows:
Within each of the foregoing priorities, the Service will give primary consideration to the acquisition of land which the owner needs to dispose of for hardship reasons; and land which the owner, voluntarily, has placed, or intends to place, on the market for sale. The land acquisition program is carried out in accordance with the specific legislative policies, if any, set forth in the legislation authorizing the area. In the absence of specific legislative directives, the land acquisition program is carried out as follows:
II. In the older national parks and monuments (generally those established prior to 1961) and where most of the lands included within the areas are now in Federal ownershipusually 90 percent or more of the total acreage in the areaa more liberal acquisition procedure has been established. In these national parks and monuments, the relatively small amount of land in private ownership, for the most part, is devoted to historic uses related to the early settlement of our Nation, such as modest homesites, ranches, limited eating establishments, or lodges. Except as a specific property may be needed in rare instances for development of public-use facilities, or where the existing use is adverse to the proposed plans for the management of the area, these historical uses may reasonably be allowed to continue until (a) such time as there is a desire on the part of the owners to dispose of their holdings; or (b) until it is proposed that the present compatible uses of these lands be altered or changed so significantly as to make them incompatible with the primary purpose for which the area was established. Accordingly, in the acquisition of the properties devoted to such compatible uses, the National Park Service shall observe the following procedure:
Water Rights Valid existing water rights of concessioners and land-use permittees on Federal lands will be acquired by the United States as funds, legal authority, and overall management objectives permit. Water rights owned by private landowners within historical areas will be acquired in connection with the acquisition of such private lands insofar as practicable. Owners of land or interests in land within or adjacent to historical areas may be granted, by special-use permit, the privilege of using water owned by the Service when it is administratively determined that the use of such water facilitates the management program of the Service. An appropriate charge shall be made for the use of such water. Owners of lands or interests in land adjacent to the historical areas may be granted, by special-use permit, the privilege of developing sources of water on Federal lands when it is administratively determined that the use of such water facilitates the management program of the Service. An appropriate charge shall be made for the use of such water. Development costs, including costs of access between the private lands to be served and the source of the water, shall be borne by the permittee. In all of these cases, the Service shall retain the right to use water from such a development. If, and when, such retained rights are exercised by the Service, it shall share in the costs of the water rights development on an equitable basis. Under this policy, as a matter of comity, the Service will notify the States of the amount of water diverted and consumed, and the priority asserted. The notice shall also include a disclaimer as to State jurisdiction. Fire and Fire Control The Service will cooperate in programs to control or extinguish any fire on lands adjacent to a historical area which poses a threat to that area or adjacent resources. (See also Fire Detection and Suppression, p. 23, Historic Preservation Policy section, and Safety and Public Health, p. 54, Resource and Visitor Use Policy section.) Soil and Moisture Conservation A historical area may participate in the program of a Grasslands Conservation District or Soil Conservation District when the purposes, plans, programs, and operation of the District are consistent with the purpose of the historical area and the policies for its management and use. (See also Historic Districts, p. 27, Historic Preservation Policy section.) Air Pollution Solid-waste Disposal Aircraft Operation The use of aircraft in historical areas is permissible in emergency situations involving the saving of human life or protection of threatened park resources, or when the use of aircraft offers significant advantages to area management and such can be accomplished with minimum disturbance to visitor enjoyment. Forest Management
The removal of forest cover in the foregoing situations is incidental to the management of the area for historical use. (See also Natural Resources Management, p. 33, this section.) Water Pollution Abatement and Control
and (2) flowing through or bounding on historical areas
Mineral Exploration, Mineral Leasing, and Mining Insects and Diseases Disposal of Natural Resources MASTER PLAN POLICY DISCUSSION The National Park Service prepares and maintains a Master Plan for the management, development, and use of each historical area. Graphics, inventories, and narrative statements describe and portray the area's resources and specify the objectives of management. A historical base map and/or archeological base map is a necessary part of the Master Plan for a historical area. Moreover, it is a valuable document in the management of the area. The historical or archeological base map rests on comprehensive research and is thoroughly documented. Like all parks, historical areas are closely related to their surroundings. For this reason, planning for a historical area must consider the related environment, large or small. Particularly, it takes cognizance of related Federal, State, and local governmental parks and development plans, facilities provided by private enterprise for the transportation and accommodation of visitors, and historic preservation and educational activities of private institutions. The Master Plan analyzes the environment in which the historical area is located and the many factors that may influence its management. When a historical area adjoins or is close to other resources of a similar nature, a joint effort to analyze the total resource base and visitor needs desirable. This may lead to cooperative plans that insure complementary and mutually compatible development, management, and interpretation of the areas. Such cooperative planning is exemplified at Independence National Historical Park in Philadelphia and at the Home of Franklin D. Roosevelt National Historic Site in Hyde Park, New York. Adequate research data is essential to sound planning. Planning teams must have studies accurately identifying and locating historic sites and features, assessing their comparative significance, and summarizing the history of the events and persons that give the area national significance. Without such data, proper boundaries cannot be proposed, and proper development cannot be planned. Moreover, a multi-disciplinary approach is necessary to insure the identification, preservation, interpretation, and highest visitor use of all the area's important resources by means of a plan that is economically, aesthetically, and administratively sound. A sound Master Plan carries out the mandates of Congress and the administrative policies of the Service by providing criteria, controls, and guidance for management, use, and development. This is done in terms of a unified planning concept for each area, consistent with and complementary to other programs of historical use, visitor accommodations, and resource planning in the surrounding district or region. It covers all programs of resource management, resource use, and physical development. It classifies land and water areas for various kinds and intensities of use. Master Plans are revised from time to time to reflect changing conditions and utilize the results of resource studies.
Master Plan Master Plan Teams Where circumstances and funds permit, study teams should also include as members, or consult with, qualified professionals or other knowledgeable persons conversant with the particular historical area and its environment. Land Classification The land classification used is similar to that proposed by the Outdoor Recreation Resources Review Commission and prescribed by the Bureau of Outdoor Recreation for application to Federal lands, as follows:
Class I and Class II identify the land reserved for visitor accommodations, administrative facilities, formal campgrounds, two-way roads, etc. (both existing and proposed), of varying intensities. They are shown on the Land Classification Plan which indicates their relationship to developments located within the historical or cultural zone. Class III identifies the "natural environment areas" which includes those lands that provide a setting, environment, or atmosphere for the historic features of the area. These lands are important to the proper preservation, interpretation, and management of the nationally significant historic resources within the areas of the National Park System. They also serve to accommodate appropriate visitor uses, of less intensity than those on Class I and Class II lands, by means that preserve the integrity of the historic resources. Limited facilities may be provided on these lands, such as one-way motor roads, foot and horse trails, small overlooks, informal picnic sites, etc. Such limited facilities must be in complete harmony with the historic values of the area. Class IV includes lands that encompass outstanding or unique natural features or wonders such as the coral reefs at Fort Jefferson and Sand Cave at Cumberland Gap. Nothing in the way of human use should be permitted on Class IV lands that intrude upon or may in any way damage or alter the scene. The sites and features are irreplaceable. Class V lands are the primitive lands that have remained pristine and undisturbed as a part of our national inheritance. They include in some instances, moreover, lands which, through National Park Service management, have been restored by the healing processes of nature to a state resembling a primeval condition. Where they exist in sufficient size, they may qualify for study and recommendation to the Congress for designation as wilderness. Facilities in Class V lands should be trails, limited primitive campsites, shelters, and sanitary facilities. Class VI lands are those on which are located the historic resources (structures, sites, or objects) that warranted the establishment of the historical area as a unit of the National Park System. Historic resources worthy of identification and preservation may also be found in natural and recreational areas of the National Park System. Physical developments are limited to those essential to preservation, restoration, if necessary, of the historical values that convey the significance of the area to the public, and such access and on-site development to accommodate appropriate use consistent with preservation. Developments shall not detract from or adversely affect historical or cultural values. Activities are generally limited to sightseeing and study of the historic or cultural features. Acquisition Zones The first zone (Zone 1Public-use and Development) includes, as a minimum, those lands needed for administrative facilities and Government or concessioner development of public-use facilities of high and moderate intensities (Class I and II lands). This zone also includes the lands of historical or cultural significance (Class VI). This zone may also include any unique natural features (Class IV), and the primitive lands (Class V), within the immediate vicinity of the historic resources that have an association with the historical or cultural resources of the area. Zone 1 also includes those Class III lands adjacent to and essential for the preservation of Class IV, V, and VI lands. The ultimate objective in this zone, usually, is to acquire full fee title to all lands. It may be, however, that in some instances, less than fee title will suffice as determined by management. For example, in this zone may be a historic home owned by an organization and open to the public. Even though fee title may not be acquired in such a property, it nevertheless should be included in Zone 1 since it does serve the public and contributes to the public use and enjoyment of the area. Similarly, an individual may own and operate a public facility, such as a restaurant, motel, or campground which it is desirable to continue in operation to serve the public. This, too, should be included in Zone 1 for the same reason, unless it exists as a part of a village or community that more properly should be included in Zone 3. A similar situation may occur in connection with an organized group camp. It is the purpose of Zone 2 (Preservation-conservation) to include those lands necessary for the preservation-conservation of the environment of the area. As a rule, these lands fall in Class III. Minimally, this zone includes (1) all additional lands considered essential to "buffer" or insure the full protection of all those lands included in Zone 1 (Public-use and Development); and (2) those lands needed to accommodate uses of less intensity than those included in Zone 1. Occasionally, this zone may include lands of historical or cultural significance (Class VI). For example, there may be a historic home, or group of homes, which contributes to the national significance of the area but which is privately owned and occupied and may, consistent with the purpose of the area, remain so. On rare occasions, this zone may contain natural features (Class IV) and primitive lands (Class V). For example, there may be research areas owned and managed by institutions of higher learning or scientific organizations which, consistent with the purpose of the area, may continue in this manner. The Service will seek such title or interest in lands within this zone as is required to achieve the foregoing objectives. In most instances, full fee title should be acquired. Often, such acquisitions may provide for life tenancy or continued occupancy for specified periods. In some instances, access easements, scenic easements, or development restrictions may suffice to accomplish the management objective. Occasionally, appropriate zoning by local authority will achieve management's objectives. Zone 3 (Private-use and Development) may or may not exist in all historical areas. Its use depends on the overall size of the area and the ownership criteria, if any, specified by the Congress in authorizing the area. The lands in Zone 3, normally, have a significant impactvisually or otherwiseon the quality and integrity of the environment of the area. Lands included in this zone, usually, involve subdivisions, villages, and similar developments. In some instances, such developments may provide important supplemental accommodations and recreational pursuits for visitors to the historical area. In these respects, therefore, the lands in this zone are similar to those in Zone 2. The most obvious distinction between the two, however, is that lands in Zone 3 serve primarily a local or community purpose and their contributions to the public use of the historical area are secondary. The reverse situation is true of the lands in Zone 2. Generally, no public-use facilities or developments requiring Government ownership of the land are planned for Zone 3. Thus, except in unusual situationsinvolving, perhaps, accesswaysacquisition in this zone of the full fee title, generally, is not necessary. In fact, acquisition of any portion of the estate may be unnecessary where local zoning is adequate and continuous to insure developments and uses complementary to and compatible with the historical area. For example, if a tract is zoned for single-family residences or low-lying commercial structures and these are compatible with the environment of the historical area, no acquisition may be needed. On the other hand, acquisition of a scenic or development easement may be necessaryin the absence of zoningto prevent development, as for example, high-rise structures that may impair the environment of the area. The three zones, as noted above, cannot be applied precisely and rigidly to each and every acre within an area. They are approximations at best. Their use as planning and management tools is designed to achieve the public purpose of historical areas while minimizing costs and reducing as much as possible personal hardships and inconveniences occasioned by land acquisition. In these circumstances, it is to be expected, quite naturally, that there will be examples found of land classifications falling into zones other than in the manner prescribed above. These exceptions should be explained in the Master Plan. In summary, however, it is to be expected that proportionately more of the lands in Zone 1 need to be acquired in fee and that the acquisition of some lesser interests, such as scenic or access easements or development restrictions, will occur less frequently than in Zones 2 and 3. In Zone 2, it is to be expected that fee acquisition, proportionately, will be less than in Zone 1 and acquisition of interests less than fee will be proportionately higher than in Zone 1 (except where lands are already in public ownership as in the case of State or public domain lands). Zoning control may also suffice in some limited cases in Zone 2. It is to be expected that zoning control will be proportionately higher in Zone 3 than in Zone 2 and that the acquisition of fee title and less than fee interests in land in Zone 3 will be proportionately lower than in Zone 2. Architectural Theme FISH AND WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT POLICY DISCUSSION In connection with fishing and hunting on lands administered by certain bureaus of the Department (including the National Park Service), the Secretary, on June 17, 1968, issued the following policy statement:
In any case where there is a disagreement, such disagreement shall be referred to the Secretary of the Interior who shall provide for a thorough discussion of the problems with representatives of the State fish and game departments and the National Park Service for the purpose of resolving the disagreement.
Fishing Where fishing is permitted, such fishing shall be carried out in accordance with applicable State laws and regulations, unless exclusive jurisdiction, as that term is defined in the Secretary's policy statement of June 17, 1968, has been ceded within the area, and a State license or permit shall be required for such fishing unless otherwise provided by law. Public Hunting Wildlife Populations Wildlife Management Program Other control measures, as necessary, shall be undertaken as follows: (1) Live-trapping in the areas for transplanting elsewhere; (2) research specimens for National Park Service and cooperating scientists; and (3) direct reduction by National Park Service personnel. It is recognized that it may be necessary, on occasion, to carry on each phase of this program simultaneously. The National Park Service will adjust the use of these control methods (except natural predation) to meet varying weather and other relevant conditions, giving highest priority to the opportunities for public hunting outside the areas and live-trapping in the areas for transplanting elsewhere. (See also Cooperation with States, p. 48, this section and Natural Resources Management, p. 33, Resource Management Policy section.) Exotic Plants and Animals Cooperation with States
admin_policies/policy1-part2.htm Last Updated: 05-Jun-2007 |