|
|
|
.gif)
|
|
|
|
National Park Service
|
|
SEAL ISLANDS
excerpts from National Register of Historic Places
InventoryNomination Form
1. Name
The Seal Islands (Fur Seal Rookeries NHL)
Pribilof Islands
2. Location
St. Paul & St. George Islands, Alaska
3. Classification
Category: District; Ownership: Public & Private; Status: Occupied; Accessible: Yes, restricted;
Present Use: Commercial, Government, Private Residence, Religious
4. Owner of Property
Name: Department of Commerce, National Marine Fisheries
Washington, D. C.
Tanadgusix Corporation
St. Paul, Alaska
Tanaq Corporation
St. George, Alaska
Alaska Diocese, Orthodox Church in America
Box 728
Kodiak, Alaska
5. Location of Legal Description
U. S. Bureau of Land Management
701 C Street
Anchorage, Alaska
6. Representation in Existing Surveys
Title:
[A] National Register of Historic Places
[A] June 13, 1962
[A] Federal Yes
[A] Department of Interior, National Park Service; Washington, D. C.
[B] Alaska Heritage Resources Survey
[B] Date: 1966-1985
[B] State Yes
[B] State of Alaska
Geological and Geophysical Survey Division
3601 C Street
8th Floor
Anchorage, Alaska 99503
|
Seals on Pribilof Islands, by Charles Snell, 1961.
|
7. Description
Condition: Fair, Deteriorated, Ruins, Unaltered & Altered, Original Site
Describe the present and original (if known) physical appearance
HISTORIC DISTRICT OVERVIEW
Two hundred and fifty miles north of the Aleutian
Chain, three hundred miles west of the Alaska mainland, separated by
forty-five miles of Bering Sea, are the Islands of Saint George and
Saint Paul. They are the largest islands of the Pribilof group,
thirty-six and fourty-four square miles respectively. The
Historic District comprises about one-fourth of this
area, including rookeries, killing grounds, and settlement areas.
Within the Historic District there are 106 contributing buildings,
two contributing structures, 12 historic sites
(rookeries) and nine archeological sites already
listed on the Alaska Heritage Resources Survey (AHRS).
The District is made up of three non-conitiguous
units, each named for its most prominent historic feature: (1) Saint
George Village; (2) Saint Paul Village; and, (3) Northeast Point,
Saint Paul Island. The historic district boundaries on Saint Paul
Island are drawn to exclude a section of the coastline so overwhelmed
by development as to have lost visual integrity. The Saint George and
Saint Paul village sections contain the commercial processing structures
of the industry as well as significant beaches, killing grounds, and old
village sites. Northeast Point contains significant beaches and
rookeries, killing grounds, and old village sites.
The boundary was drawn to include representative
remnants of both commercial harvesting and processing, significant
historical and archeological sites, and the living history of the
unique labor force. The proposed boundaries are drawn to eliminate areas
not consistently associated with the industry or those which have
lost visual integrity. The interiors of both islands were excluded, as
sealing is a coastal industry, confined to beaches, adjacent killing
grounds, and the villages. The north shore of Saint Paul Island was
excluded as the industry other than at Northeast Point, was primarily
confined to the south shore after 1799. The historic district
boundaries on Saint Paul Island are drawn to exclude a section of the
coastline so overwhelmed by development as to have lost visual
integrity. Zapadni on Saint George Island was also excluded, as
construction of a boat harbor has destroyed historic integrity.
Saint George Island
Saint George Island rises out of the Bering Sea, in
same places as high as 1,000 feet. Only two and one-half miles of the
island's twenty-one mile coastline are beaches; the rest of the
shoreline is high cliffs. In the eighteenth century
the Russians built barabaras at Zapadni on the southern
shore, at Staraya Artil to the east of the village and the permanent
village of Saint George on the northern shore. The boundary of the
Historic District encloses the village of Saint George on the south,
then follows the road east of town to its end one mile out of town at
East Reef Rookery. The boundary encircles the Rookery, then follows the
coastline back to the west, passing the community of Saint George on the
north, and proceeds along the coastline for another two miles to include
North Rookery and Staraya Artil Rookery. Here the boundary line turns
inland, encircling the archeological site, Staraya Artil, and then
follows the road back to Saint George.
After the Alaska Purchase in 1867 the Alaska
Commercial Company, which owned monopoly rights to the fur seal industry
in the islands, destroyed all Russian structures and replaced them with
frame buildings, constructing a new village on top of the old. In 1928
the United States Department of Commerce, then administrators of the fur
seal industry, continued the practice by systematically razing the
village and constructing a new one on the foundations of the old. The
pattern still remains: orderly rows of houses nestled into the hillside,
administrative and staff housing to one side, and a commercial center at
the bottom of the hill near the sea. (M3; P13; P14)
Saint George the Great Martyr Orthodox Church is the
center of the community. The present structure, completed in 1936, is
the traditional frame building with horizontal siding and narthex. The
Church still has the traditional onion shaped done, although there is
wind damage to its canvas cover. Just north of the present structure
within the churchyard is a cross that marks the altarplace of the old
nineteenth century church. (M3; P15; P16)
At the bottom of the hill between the Church and the
sea is the commercial center. Nine of the fourteen buildings in this
area are identified as part of the seal fur and carcass processing
facilities: a long wooden frame structure once used as a coal house,
most recently used for storage; (P45; P46) the Aleutian Bunkhouse, now
the teacher's house; (P47) two small frame buildings next to the dock;
a two-story wood frame building (P32); a large "U" shaped building used
as the kench house, blubbering house, and wash house with animal pens on
the exterior. This building is presently being converted into
apartments and laboratory space for National Marine Fisheries (NMF)
personnel. This building dominates the commercial center both by its
size and visual interest. (P33) Last in the area is the machine shop, a
large cement structure. (P44) Portions of the waterfront area of Saint
George were destroyed by fire in 1950. True to the pattern, new
buildings were built on the foundations of the old.
Directly uphill from the commercial center, with a
commanding view of the dock, is the old administrative core with staff
housing. Fouke Company House, presently the hotel, is the largest
building. It was built into the hillside with two stories on the south
end and three stories on the north. It borders an open field where the
flagpole once belonging to Old Government House still stands. (P22; P23)
Uphill, above the field, is a row of one and one-half story cement
bungalows with a cement sidewalk running along the front. They
originally served as homes for the agent, storekeeper, physician, and
schoolteacher. Presently they are teacher's and NMF personnel housing. (P28)
Six rows of frame houses ascend the hillside
southeast of the Church. Unlike Saint Paul, where all houses face the
same direction, the homes on Saint George face each other across the
roads, providing a less regimented, neighborhood appearance. These were
originally homes for resident Aleut laborers; they remain the homes of
the people of Saint George. (P48) Adajacent to the housing, below the
eastern bluff that supports the village, is the Community Center. A
large building, it was begun prior to World War II but was not completed
until after the evacuation and return of the people to Saint George. It
still functions as a community center.
Non-historic elements of the village include: modern
additions to the commercial center grouped to the east of the old
commercial buildings; three new modular homes interspaced within the
rows of houses on the hill; several new homes east of the Community
Center, under construction in 1986. The five homes nearest the Community
Center, although they appear newer than the hillside houses, are
contributing structures, as they were constructed under the
administrators during the period of significance. The recently
constructed school, clinic, and combination city offices, store and
warehouse are non-contributing elements within the District. The new
subdivision south of the village is outside the boundaries of the
Historic District.
Outside the community of Saint George, but within the
Historic District, are three historic Rookeries and an old village site.
The rocky beaches at East Reef, North, and Staraya Artil Rookeries
remain relatively unchanged over time. (P50) There has not been a
commercial hunt on Saint George in over ten years, so even the killing
grounds, usually readily visible because of the lush vegetation fed by
the results of the slaughter, are blending in with the countryside. The
landscape is characterized by moss covered rocks, high grasses, and
flowers, leading down to black rocky beaches covered with seals. In
summer months the sea is filled with swimming, diving, feeding seals as
far as the eye can see.
An old village site and rookery are located at
Staraya Artil. (AHRS XPI0l5) (P51) The two are linked by a tidal zone
pond where bachelor seals station themselves, removed from the harems in
the rookery. In the muck around the pond are seal, walrus, and whale
bones, remnants of former occupations. East of the pond, in the tall
grass, are the barabara sites marking the old village of Staraya
Artil.
Saint Paul Island
The Saint Paul landscape is marked by weathered lava,
scoria, and sandy deposits. Hills, remnants of explosion craters, dot
the landscape. The Historic District is located along the southern
coastline. It begins at Zapadni Point and stretches toward the City of
Saint Paul three miles away, bordered on the south by the coastline and
on the north by the scoria-covered road. The boundary follows the road
to the base of Telegraph Hill, where the road and boundary line separate.
The boundary turns south, following the Polovina Turnpike as it curves
around the Salt Lagoon, then follows the dirt road leading to the
Lukanin-Kitovi Rookery on the coast. Lukanin Bay and Tonki Point are
excluded from the Historic District because development here has
destroyed historical integrity. The Historic District begins again at
Halfway Point, bounded by the scoria covered road on one side and
coastline on the other. At Polovina Hill the boundary leaves the scoria
road to turn inland, following a dirt road bordering the sand dunes to
the sea. (M4)
Included in the Historic District on Saint Paul
Island are five rookeries and their historic killing grounds; six sites
listed on the Alaska Historic Resources Survey (AHRS); and the community
of Saint Pual. This is about one tenth of the total area of the
island.
The City of Saint Paul clings to a steep hillside
with its back to the Bering Sea on a narrow sandy peninsula on the
extreme south end of the island. Administrators in the American period
created three distinct sectors to the community: the commercial center,
located along the shoreline and historic killing grounds of the now
extinct Village Cove Rookery; administrative buildings and staff housing
centrally located; and resident Aleut laborer housing laid out in
orderly rows on either side of the village center. Public buildings
remain near the group served. (P5; P6; P57; P58)
Rebuilt in 1907, the Holy Martyrs Saints Peter and
Paul Orthodox Church is the center of the community. It is a traditional
building except that the characteristic wooden onion-shaped dome,
repeatedly destroyed by wind, was replaced by a wrought iron
onion-shaped configuration. The churchyard borders the priest's house
and cemetery. (P51; P52)
Also bordering the churchyard at the center of the
community are the administrative buildings and staff quarters. Old
Government House, presently the offices of the Indian Reorganization Act
(IRA) Tribal Council and apartments, is the most prominent of the
administrative buildings. (P75; P76) In close proximity are Old Company
House, presently the King Eider Hotel (P78); the old laundry, now
abandoned (79); the old Fisheries Offices, presently a tavern (77);
three one and one-half story cement bungalows sitting in a row with
front sidewalks and sod, formerly known individually as "Employee House"
and "Teacher's House," presently used for community housing. (P71)
Buildings serving the community's social and medical needs are also
located in this central area of the village: the physician's residence
and dispensery, now joined by an addition and used as the clinic (P80);
the Recreation Hall, now the offices of City Government (P81); and the
old theater, now abandoned. (P82)
The seal processing complex is a distinctive part of
the Historic District. Along the bottom of the hill, at the end of
Tolstoi Boulevard and on the sand flats between the community and
Village Cove stand the seal processing buildings. Six large buildings
still retain evidence of their functions in the historic industry: the
boxing shed, kench house, blubbering house, and the bunkhouse for
sealing assistants in one grouping, and the equipment garage and machine
shop in another. The boxing shed, kench house, and blubbering house
were built during the post World War I boon in the sealing industry. The
boxing shed and kench house were lengthened during the 1930s. The
blubbering house has a modern addition. Located in a row, almost
identical in design and materials, these three buildings retain historic
character. (P83) All are underutilized and in a state of disrepair. The
former bunkhouse for sealing assistants, row the Tanadgusix Corporation
Offices and hotel annex, rounds out the group of buildings tied directly
to the sealing industry. (P85) Buildings with functions supportive of
the industry, such as the machine shop and equipment garage at the end
of Tolstoi Boulevard and the paint shop below on the sand (P86; P87) are
consistent in design and materials with the seal processing buildings.
All were constructed in the 1930s.
Uphill from the industrial buildings and ranging on
either side of the village center are the orderly rows of housing for
Aleut laborers. All houses face out from the hillside, overlooking the
historic killing grounds below. There are thirteen houses of frame
construction and similar design constructed between 1915 and 1935 (P91);
nineteen concrete houses of a similar design to the frame houses built
between 1935 and 1955 (P92); and nine nearly identical houses with
asphalt siding built post-World War II. (P94) The order, repetition, and
anonymity of these houses serve to visually reinforce the company town
character of the District.
Below the village in Gorbatch Bay swim the seals of
Reef Rookery. (P59; P60) Within the Historic District are nine
rookeries and five old village sites. (M4) Because Saint Paul is a
volcanic island with little erosion over time and, until recently, no
development that was not related to the seal industry, the landscapes
remain relatively unchanged. Periodically, within recorded history, the
sea has reclaimed the narrow neck of land at Northeast Point, turning
the peninsula into an island. The sand dunes around Big Lake shift,
covering the scoria and plank road with as much as three feet of sand.
(M10) Otherwise, there have been few changes over time in the landscapes
of the Historic District. Zapadni, Tolstoi, Reef, Kitovi and Lukanin
Rookeries are similar black rock beaches backed by low rocky cliffs
covered with grasses and flowers. (P95; P96; P97) Pobovina, Polovina
cliffs, and East and West Rookeries on the Northeast Point sector are
similar black rock beaches bordered by rising sand dunes dotted with
deep grasses. (p115. P116) The adjacent killing grounds are readily
identifiable by the extremely lush vegetation fed by the slaughter. The
old village sites of Vesolia Mista (AHRS XPI-016) (P99), and
Zapadni (AHRS XPI-007) (P101; P102) are located within the District as
well as the legendary site of discovery at English Bay. (M9)
The two extant catwalks (of nine originally
constructed) are contributing structures, one at Reef Rookery (P95; P96;
P97) and one at East and West Rookeries. (P115; P116; P117) In the 1920s
the U.S. Department of Commerce administrators constructed these
catwalks over the rookeries to facilitate the annual census of the seal
herds. The design is simple: strategically placed scaffolds with a
wooden catwalk stretching from apex to apex. The ten foot high walks
are reached by climbing a ladder nailed to the side of the first
scaffold. Wooden railing along one side of the catwalk and a wire
stretched along the other serve as safety devices. They are in fair to
poor condition.
Condition of Resources
Resource conditions vary widely in this Historic
District. Buildings that retain their historic functions or are valued
by the community are in good condition. Saint George the Great Martyr
and Saints Peter and Paul Orthodox Churches are well maintained.
However, within each are valuable books and icons that are in need of
specialized care and, in some instances, restoration. The King Eider
Hotel and the Saint George Hotel, as commercial enterprises, are well
maintained and recognized by the communities as historic assets. On the
other end of the spectrum are the buildings directly related to the
sealing industry. Since commercial sealing ceased with the expiration of
the North Pacific Fur Seal Convention in 1985, these buildings will no
longer fulfill their historic functions. Presently they are in a state
of disrepair; some are in danger of permanent loss. There is no
community concensus on the historic value of these
buildings, as exists for the churches and hotels.
There are no local ordinances or official protective management policies
in effect for either historic buildings or the old village sites. Some
"potting" is occurring at known sites.
As new industries are developed to provide the
economic base needed to replace the sealing industry, the District could
be in real danger of losing its integrity.
CONTRIBUTING AND NON-CONTRIBUTING RESOURCES
SAINT GEORGE ISLAND (Note: Lettering corresponds to
Map 3.)
Village Center: Administrative and Public buildings
Saint George the Great Martyr Church, 1936. (H)
Listed on the National Register of Historic Places. Significant objects
within the Church include articles dating to the previous nineteenth
century Church: a chandelier, chalice and crosses, 1845 (P19); five
bells, 1875: a redwood cross fashioned from wood from the old church by
Mr. Andronik Kashevaroff of Saint George. Ikons with historical
interest include "Saint Petroluman" from the old church and "Virgin
Mary" and "Our Lord Jesus Christ" worked by Father Theodosius. (P21)
Handworked altar cloths made by the women of Saint George date back
fifty years (P18; P19). This is only a representative sample of the
treasures in this Church. The building is well cared for on a routine
basis but in need of structural repairs.
Company House, 1930. (J) 56'0"x36'0". Three story,
wood frame building with horizontal siding and six-over-six windows.
Upper floor: sleeping rooms and bath (P26; P27); middle floor: sleeping
rooms, bath and library with built in wood and glass bookcases, original
books in place (P24; P25); ground floor: kitchen and dining area. Recently, new wooden fire
escapes were added, replacing ladders nailed to the side of the building.
Company House was renamed Saint George Rooming House in 1930 as the
property of the Bureau of Fisheries; now owned by Tanaq Corporation and
used as a hotel.
Cottages; ca. 1930s. (K, L, M, N) One and one-half
story cement bungalows exactly alike. Originally homes for the agent,
storekeeper, physician, and schoolteacher. M was also the old hospital.
Presently housing for NMF personnel and community. (P30; P31)
New Firehouse. (P) 20'3"x12'5". Wood frame with
horizontal clapboard siding with a bell tower rising from southwest
corner. Remodeled as living quarters; presently identified as Quarters
No. 7.
New Firehouse. (Q) Wood frame with horizontal
clapboard siding.
Commercial Center:
Abandoned Pump House and Winch House, ca. 1951. (A,
B) Two small buildings: A, concrete and B, frame. Winch used to load and unload
materials and boats at townside dock. Severe beach erosion has
undermined the foundations.
Plumbing and Electrical Shop, ca. 1951. (C) Two
story, wood frame structure with horizontal siding has severe structural
deficiencies. Rebuilt after Saint George fire of 1950. (P32)
Sealing Plant, 1951. (D) 128'9"X102'0". This complex
burned down in 1950 and was rebuilt over the original foundation. A wood
frame building with concrete walls. Older methods of processing are
reflected in this building and its extant equipment: wash house, kench
house with tables, brine tanks and blubbering house (P38; P39),
cooperage upstairs where some barrel staves remain. Skins were placed
in redwood vats with large metal waffle grates placed on top to hold
them down while they were flushed with sea water. These vats remain in
the wash house as do the blubbering racks in the blubbering house.
(P35; P36) The 12' X12' kench tables, some still holding skins in salt
for storage, are intact (P37). The salting process was replaced by the
newer brine process. Here skins were placed in a redwood tank, agitated
by a paddle wheel, hung to dry, packed in borax, rather than salt, and
then shipped to Fouke Company. The extant redwood tank may be the last
of its kind. (P40: P41) Cement tanks with slat boxes and a re-designed
paddle wheel replaced the redwood tank. (P42; P43) Presently National
Marine Fisheries (NMF) personnel are in the process of converting part
of the ground floor into a laboratory with living quarters upstairs.
Previously, NMF personnel added some removable fencing in the wash house
creating seal pens used in conducting seal behavior experiments. Other
than these changes to the interior, which are consistent with is
historic use, the seal processing facility retains its historical
integrity.
Machine Shop, 1948. (E) 44'0"X62'0". Concrete walls with reinforced steel,
(not "reinforced concrete"). Has a high gambrel roof. Presently a repair shop. Similar in
materials and design to the seal processing plant; good visual integrity. (P44)
Coal Shed, 1930s. (F) 80'X30'. Concrete walls up to
fifteen feet high pocketed into hillside, thus one side of the building
is at grade near the eave line, while the other side has full-height
concrete walls. Most recently used for storage. Needs structural repairs.
(P45; P46)
Aleutian Bunkhouse, 1940. (G) 64'0"X20'3"
Single story wood frame dwelling. Originally
housed Aleutian workers brought in for the seal
harvest and processing; presently the teacher's
house. (P47)
Aleut Laborers' Housing:
Housing on Saint George, in keeping with the company
town nature of the community, cane in two varieties: (I) Wood frame, one
and one-half story with gable roof and arctic entry; 1920s-1930s;
(II) Same basic house type as (I), only concrete; 1930s (only two of
these built because St. George Island lacked gravel for concrete); (III)
larger frame houses, same basic type, all with green asphalt siding;
1940s-1950s.
Type I: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15,
16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 23, 24
Type II: 4, 22
Type III: 31, 32, 34, 35, 36
Community Hall, 1949. (O) Large frame structure with
a double gable roof line. Construction began in 1940 but was delayed by the
evacuation of the island in 1942.
Non-Contributing Resources
Commercial Center: gas station; modern brick garage;
Tanaq Fisheries; second modern brick garage; powerhouse; four modular
storage buildings.
Village Center: school; clinic; combination city
offices, store and warehouse; house; NMF personnel apartments.
Housing: three new modular homes; new homes under
construction.
Archeological Resources
Staraya Artil: (AHRS XPI-015) Russian, liberally
translates "old association for common work." Historic village site,
reportedly one of the first Russian settlements in the islands. (M2;
P51)
SAINT PAUL ISLAND (Note: Letters correspond to Map 5)
Village Center:
Administrative Buildings and Staff Residences
Saints Peter and Paul Orthodox Church, 1907. (A)
Traditional building listed on the National Register of Historic places.
The 1907 church was built on the foundations of the previous church,
which was constructed in the mid-1800s. Portions of the earlier church
appear to have been incorporated into the new buildings, as was
customary for both religious and practical reasons. The iconostasis
(the interior altar wall) and many of the icons and other articles from
the nineteenth century church were installed in the 1907 building. The
church is well cared for and structurally sound, but subject always to
the harsh climate and limited funds for major repairs. (P63; P64; P65,
P66; P67; P68; P69)
Priest's House, 1929. (B) Frame structure with
horizontal wood siding. Horizontal gable roof with jerkinheads. Design
is similar to Government House across the churchyard. (P70)
Teacher's Houses, 1948. (C, D, E) Three houses
exactly alike placed in a row. One and one-half story cement
bungalows with front sidewalks and sod yards. Formally known as
"Employees Houses," the group is informally known as "stocking row."
Presently one house is used by the tour guide in the summer; the others
are private homes. (P71; P72; P73; P74)
Government House, 1932. (F) Large frame building
with cement foundation; horizontal gable roof with cross gable ends; suffered
interior fire damage in 1936. Presently used for apartments and business
offices of the IRA Tribal Council. (P75; P76)
Fisheries Office, 1930s. (G) Frame concrete building
with jerkinheads and outside entrance to cellar or basement. Presently
a tavern. (P77)
Company House, 1923. (H) Three-story frame building
with horizontal siding. Some modernization in 1932. Presently the King
Eider Hotel. Upper floors are sleeping rooms with central bath; main
floor is the hotel lobby which was once the library with built-in wooden
shelves with glass doors. (P78)
Laundry, 1926. (I) Two-story cement building with
horizontal gables. Originally used as a laundry for Company House;
presently abandoned. (P79)
Hospital, 1934. (J,K) Physician's house and
dispensary (1929) and old hospital (1934) joined by a modern addition
(1974). J has a front stoop and dormers, similar in design to Company
House, and maintains the appearance of a residence. K is a simple one
story frame building. The addition is non-contributing. (P80)
Recreation Hall, 1948. (L) Replaced old recreation
hall which burned in 1945. Large two story frame building. Presently the
offices of the City of Saint Paul. (P81)
Theater, 1940s. (M) Single story wood frame building
with a single gable roof and horizontal siding; no windows. Originally
a movie theater, then a dance hall; presently abandoned. (P82)
Commercial Center
Blubbering House, 1930s. (N) Frame building with
horizontal clapboard siding; a Butler building type of addition runs perpendicular
to and away from the blubbering house. Presently used for storage. Needs
structural repairs. (P83)
Kench House, 1930. 106' x 32' 10". (O) Frame building
with horizontal clapboard siding. Building was lengthened in the 1930s.
Originally the kench house, then drying shed (for drying seal skins);
presently used for storage. Needs structural repairs. (P83)
Boxing Shed, 1920s. (P) 160' 8" x 34' 6". Balloon
framed, one and one-half story, horizontal clapboard siding; same
design and materials as Blubbering House and Kench House. Building was
lengthened in the 1930s. Originally a kench house, later a barrel shed,
presently storage. Needs structural repairs. (P83; P84)
Fouke Bunkhouse, 1932. (Q) Large frame building with
horizontal siding of similar design and materials to other boom period
buildings. Originally a bunkhouse for sealing assistants, presently
Tanadgusix Corporation (TDX) Building and Hotel Annex. (P85)
Machine Shop. (R) Two-story, wood frame
with large bow-string trusses. A ramp built of rock leads to second
floor storage. Originally machine shop, then fire department, a
non-compatible new addition joined the Machine shop and Equipment garage
in the 1980s. The new addition, which is neither the same material,
color, nor style as the two historic buildings it joins, does not
destroy the integrity of the two because of their obvious contrast and
large size. (P86)
Equipment Garage, 1930s. (S) 100' x 54' 6";
single-story wood frame building with large bow string trusses;
presently the tire shed.
Small frame structure. (T) May possibly be one of
the houses constructed pre-1918. Abandoned.
Paint Shop, 1930s. (U) 60' x 28' 4"; wood frame shed
with horizontal clapboard siding, sawbuck doors, similar to boxing shed
and kench house. Presently used for the storage of paint and other
highly flammable materials. Sand drifts form around and in this
building. (P87)
Six Car Garage, 1930s. (V) 73' 2" x 28';
single-story wood frame with horizontal clapboard siding. Presently
abandoned with sand drifts around and inside.
By-Products Plant, 1924. (W) Large frame structure
with horizontal clapboard siding. Remodeled interior and exterior in
the 1930s; abandoned, reopened, abandoned again, and remodeled again;
the interior was remodeled as recently as the 1970s. Presently
abandoned, it is in need of structural repairs. By-products (products
incidental to the fur seal industry) produced at one time or another on
Saint Paul include: fox food, dog team food, mink food, crab bait,
fertilizer, and oil. Between 1965 and 1975 a mink farmer removed old
boilers to install experimental freezing equipment. The exterior retains
the historic character of the 1930 seal processing building. (P88;
P89)
Resident Aleut Laborers' Housing
Reflecting the company town nature of the community,
houses on Saint Paul come in three types: (I) 1920s through 1930s, one
or one and one-half story frame with horizontal wood siding, arctic
entrance to one side, and side cellars; (P91) (II) one and one-half
story concrete with arctic entrance and side cellars; (III)
1945-1950s. Larger one and one half story cement with green
asphalt siding. Some houses have small (10' x 14") outbuildings which were
originally washhouses (1939); presently saunas or storage.
(I) Nos. 3, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 42, 48, 47(0),
46, 45(0), 44(0).
(II) Nos. 1, 2, 4, 5, 6(0), 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12,
13, 14, 41, 40, 39, 38(0), 37(0), 49.
(III) Nos. 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61.
Non-Contributing Resources
Village Center: school, "temporary building" housing
church school, A-frame shed; coffee shop; remodeled school district
apartments; post office.
Commercial Center: combination store, airline office,
warehouse; combination hotel restaurant and Aleutian bunkhouse; metal
storage building; gas station; elephant hut; quonset hut; frame building
hit by barge; storage building; powerhouse; two storage buildings
nearest to shore; ten storage tanks on hillside; NMF buildings and
apartments across Village Cove.
Housing: two teacher's houses next to school; bottom
row and top row of new ranch houses; house next to C, D, and E; duplex
and four other houses belonging to the old naval complex; the old naval
communications building; pastor's residence and Assembly of God Church;
new subdivision on hillside east of town under construction in the 1980s.
Buildings outside the community: dilapidated ice
house at Ice Lane (P100); dilapidated building at Webster Lake (P112); private
residence at Webster Lake (P108; P109) open plywood blinds at rookeries;
enclosed viewing stand at Lukanin Rookery.
Archeological resources: (Note: see map 4)
Zapadnie: (AHRS XPI-007) Twenty-three discernable
pits on a consolidated parabolic dune, measuring from 15' x 12' to
18'-20' square, and two 35' x 15' shallow rectangular pits
surrounded by smaller pits. Some pits may have been for storage.
Fourteen pits have discernable entrance passages. Three large pits were
interconnected by two lateral passages (P101; P102; P103).
School site: (AHRS-XPI-006) Thirteen ceramic sherds,
one square nail and one flenser were surface collected from this
location. Artifacts are accessioned to University of Alaska Anchorage:
UAA 83-3.
Webster Lake: (AHRS XPI-009) At least
twenty-two house depressions situated on two parabolic dunes.
Midden consisting of sea mammal bones and historic debris is exposed by
extensive potting. Site was used prior to World War II as a hunting and
lookout (for walrus) camp (P110; P111; P113; P114).
Polovina (Halfway Point): (AHRS XPI-008) Eleven
square to rectangular barabara pits, measuring 12-18' on a side situated
on a consolidated parabolic dune (P105).
Lukanin Hill: (AHRS XPI-01l) Probable site
disturbed by military use during World War II and later. Historic
debris, mammal bones, a bone projectile point, and two fastened
vertebrae were reportedly found (P99).
Vesolia Mista: (AHRS XPI-016) Russian,
translates as a "happy place," reportedly located just northeast of Big
Lake on northeast coast of island; reported one of the first settlements
on the island, position indicated by Elliott. Area covered with blowing
dunes (P106).
|
St. Paul and St. George, by Sandra Faulkner, 1985.
|
8. Significance
Period: 1700-1799, 1800-1899, 1900-; Areas of Significance: Conservation,
Industry, Social/Humanitarian
Specific Dates: 1786, 1867, 1911, 1942, 1960; Builder/Architect: Bureau of
Fisheries, U.S. Department of Commerce & U.S. Department of Interior
Statement of Significance
The Seal Islands possess outstanding historical
significance to the themes of industry, conservation, and ethnic
heritage. 1786-1959, the period of significance, encompasses a
consistent pattern of development, administration, and concerns in the
industry from discovery to Alaska statehood.
Discovered in the 1780s as the home of the world's
largest single herd of mammals, the northern fur seal, the islands of
Saint Paul and Saint George, the Seal Islands, remain the primary site
of the world's fur seal industry. This industry generated conflict
between nations and peoples for the last two hundred years and dominated
the islands from discovery in 1786 until Alaska statehood in 1959. The
islands were the major focus of international conservation policymaking
in its infancy late in the nineteenth century. The North Pacific Sealing
Convention of 1911 was a pioneering effort involving many years and four
great powers: the United States, Great Britain, Japan, and Russia.
Compared to the other international conservation treaties of the period,
for example, the Niagara Falls treaty, the Sealing Convention was the
most significant agreement of its time. The controversy continues with
the present turmoil surrounding the expiration without renewal of the
Northern Fur Seal Convention. The site is associated as well with a
unique chapter in the history of the Aleut people, the homogeneous
permanent population of the islands and the labor force of the fur seal
industry from its inception to its recent demise as a commercial
enterprise. Because the site is remote, the environment harsh, and the
sealing industry, with all its conflicts is still a pervasive presence,
there is a unique sense of historical cohesiveness on Saint Paul and
Saint George Islands.
Historical Context
It was the lure of furs, rather than empire, that
enticed the promyshlenniki, the Russian equivalent of the
American mountain men, eastward across the expanse of the Russian
frontier in Siberia, Kamchatka and into the Bering Sea. Between 1743 and
1780 this advance progressed along the Aleutian Chain involving as many
as forty-two different fur companies and over one hundred voyages. In
the 1780s a new era in the history of the Russian fur trade began.
Grigorii Ivanovich Shelikov and Ivan Golikov had the imagination to
envision, through the establishment of permanent settlements under their
fur company, a colonial structure. In 1788 Tsarina Cathrine II rewarded
their vision with a sword and a medal of recognition. (1)
In 1786 and 1787, after years of searching the fogs
of the Bering Sea, Gerasim Pribilov of the Lebedev-Lastochkin Fur
Company discovered and named the legendary uninhabited seal islands:
Saint George and Saint Paul. The first two seasons the Company
established crews of one hundred thirty-seven promyshlenniki and
native Aleuts from Unalaska and Atkha in the Aleutian Islands. They
built barabaras, partially underground sod huts, establishing
hunting villages at Zapadni, Staraya Artil, and Garden Cove on Saint
George Island and on the south shore of Saint Paul Island. In the
following seasons rival fur companies established Maroonitch on the
north shore and Vesolia Mista in the sand dunes near Big Lake on Saint
Paul Island. Because of this competition, the Lebedev-Lastochkin Company
established hunting villages at Polovina and Zapadni. In 1799 the
Company, now the Russian American Company, received more substantial
royal recognition when Tsar Paul issued a twenty year charter granting
them monopoly rights to the Colony. This eliminated competition and with
it the need for so many hunting villages. The people of Saint Paul were
all drawn together for "economy and warmth" at Polovina. The present
site of the village of Saint George was chosen as "the best place,
geographically, for the business of gathering the skins and salting them
down". (2) This began a pattern of settlement and development dominated
by the concerns of the fur seal industry.
The Company continued to administer the Colony
through the First Charter, 1799-1819, the Second Charter,
1821-1842, and the Third Charter, 1842-1867. Exploitation of
the resource was the first and only consideration during the period of
discovery and settlement. Later, after the turn of the eighteenth
century, during the period of the First Charter, Nikolai Petrovich
Rezanov, heir to Shelikov's Company and vision, tempered this
singleminded dedication to profit through establishment of permanent
settlements, churches, schoolsin short, the Russian-American
Colony.
In 1867 the Russian government sold the
Russian-American Colony to the United States of America. Through the
Army, the War Department administered Alaska from the purchase in 1867
until 1877, except for the Seal Islands, which were declared a special
reservation for governmental purposes and placed under the control of
the Department of Treasury. Consistent with American laissez-faire
economic principles in 1870, the government granted the Alaska
Commercial Company a twenty year lease for the exclusive rights to the
resources of the Seal Islands.
Between 1877 and 1884 the Navy and Customs Office
administered Alaska. In 1884 "An Act Providing a Civil Government for
Alaska" provided for the Presidential appointment of a Governor and for
a district court and officials. But the Seal Islands remained under the
control of private enterprise. In 1890 the North American Commercial
Company won the lease over the seal industry and the administration of
the islands.
In 1912 "A Bill to create a Territorial Legislature in the
Territory of Alaska, to confer legislative powers thereon and for other
purposes" established a territorial form of government that lasted until
statehood in 1959. The Pribilof Islands were again an exception. In 1903
the administration of the "seal islands" was transferred from the
Secretary of the Treasury to the Secretary of Commerce and Labor, who
placed the islands under the direct control of the Commissioner of
Fisheries in 1908. (3) The 1910 Fur Seal Act ended the private lease
system and placed the Pribilofs under the jurisdiction of the Federal
government. The Department of Commerce and Labor and its Bureau of
Fisheries were responsible for the seal industry. In 1940 the Bureau of
Fisheries was removed from Commerce and placed in the Department of
Interior. The Commissioner of Fisheries continued responsibility for
the islands. In the post-war years management was transferred to the
Seattle office of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. (4) In 1958 the
industry was considered important enough that the Federal Government
retained sovereignty over the Pribilof seals, agreeing to pay the new
State of Alaska seventy per cent of the net proceeds from the seal
industry. But the islands became part of the new State of Alaska and the
old pattern of administration disappeared.
Industry
The fur seal industry itself was the most profitable
fur resource for the Russians. During the First Charter fur exports
from the colonies were: fur seals, 1,232,274; sea otters, 72,894; beaver
tails, 59,530; and blue polar foxes, 36,362. During the Third Charter
the depleted herds still yielded 277,788 fur seals from Saint Paul and
31,923 fur seals from Saint George. (6) At the time of the Purchase the
seal herds were considered the only resource of real economic value in
the territory. (7) This industry alone repaid the American government
many times over the purchase price of Alaska. During the tenure of the
Alaska Commercial Company the seal industry yielded annual profits to
the U S. Government alone of $2,500,000. As an international industry,
the profits extended from the company to the European fashion industry
that purchased the processed pelts at London auctions. (8) The North
Pacific Sealing Convention of 1911 mandated a moratorium on sealing that
eliminated the entire industry until after World War I.
In the 1920s the sealing industry boomed. As a
result of the moratorium the herds increased dramatically in size. In
1921 catwalks were built, nine on Saint Paul and one on Saint George, to
facilitate the seal census. The Bureau of Fisheries in the Department
of Commerce reported 581,443 animals of all ages. (9) In 1923 15,920
animals were killed with 10,000 males reserved as breeders. In 1930 the
Commissioner of Fisheries reported herd population at 971,527, much
smaller than the millions reported in the nineteenth century, yet sales
reported still neared the $1,000,000.00 mark. (11) The pattern
that followed over the next decade was an increase in the number of
animals taken and a decrease in the number of breeders retained. By 1940
the yearly kill quota had increased four times while the breeder group,
which had decreased twenty percent by 1929, was simply reported as
"sufficient reserve for breeding." (12) During the 1940s the annual
yield of sealskins leveled off. By 1952 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Biologists determined that the herd had reached, or was near, its peak
of development numbering 1,500,000 animals. (13) The herds of the
Pribilof Islands comprise about 85% of the world's fur seals. In 1967
the industry was still profitable; the seal skins from the Pribilofs
sold for $2,839,682. (14) However, the industry essentially disappeared
when the Northern Fur Seal Convention expired without renewal in 1985.
Conservation
Conservation measures for the seal herds began early
in the Russian period of Alaskan History. In 1803 and again in 1805 the
Board of Directors of the Russian American Company ordered a temporary
halt on the fur seal catch. Oversupply of furs caused the first order.
In 1803 280,000 fur seal pelts were taken while 500,000 were still in
warehouses. Rezanov, who issued the second order upon his visit to
inspect the islands, reported to Tsar Paul that while the seal herds
seemed large, there were "only a tenth as many as there used to be," as
more than a million seal skins had been taken on the islands. (15) This
was the first attempt to apply conservation principles to the seal
harvest. The hunters and Alexander Andreevich Baranof, colonial
manager, paid little or no heed to the orders. During the Third
Charter, 1844-1861, the Company considered conservation measures
successful. During this period the Company tried to refine and define
established procedures. The Company sent an experienced hunter to Saint
Paul Island "to teach the method of closed seasons employed on the
Commander Islands" in hopes of saving the seal herds from extinction.
(16)
After the American Purchase, the recipient of the
monopoly rights to the islands was to maintain the successful
conservation measures applied by the Russian American Company. A sealing
census determined the yearly quota of skins. Henry Elliott, naturalist
and Special Treasury Agent with a commission to study wildlife from the
Smithsonian Institute, estimated the herds in 1872 at 4,700,000 animals.
The Alaska Commercial Company harvested 150,000 seals per year at an
annual yield of $2,500,000. (17) This was double the harvest during
the Third Charter of the Russian-American Company. The North American
Commercial Company maintained the harvest quota established in the 1870s
even though it became clear that Elliott's estimates were wildly
exaggerated. By 1909, the end of the contract system, there were only
130,000 seals left. (18)
High profits from a resource that required little
effort to exploitit neither had to be fed, dug up, nor sought
outattracted international interest, as well. The depletion, often
to the point of extinction, of other seal herds turned the focus of the
world's fur seal industry on the islands of Saint George and Saint
Paul. The result was an international conservation interest. While the
land harvest certainly had a detrimental effect on the size of the
herds, there was an even greater danger. Pelagic sealing, the taking of
seals at sea, began in 1868. By the 1890s citizens of the United
States, Great Britain, then Canada, Japan, and Russia manned pelagic
sealing fleets in the north Pacific. Pelagic sealing was most dangerous
to herd size, as only females range out to sea to feed from the rookeries.
Each female killed at sea represented in reality the loss of three seals;
the female herself; the pup she carried, as females were impregnated
within days of giving birth; and the pup left on shore, since a female
will only feed her own pup. The land harvest method limited the kill to
bachelor seals, three or four year old non-breeding males.
The Paris Tribunal of 1893 was the first in a series
of international conferences to prevent the extermination of the
northern fur seal. In 1897 the United States outlawed pelagic sealing
by U. S. citizens. In the same year she hosted a joint conference in
Washington, D.C. Russia and Japan accepted, but Great Britain declined
to attend while agreeing to attend a Fur Seal Experts Conference held
concurrently. In 1906 the problem exploded when Japanese citizens were
killed while poaching seals in the Pribilofs. (19) In this year of
excesses, President Theodore Roosevelt threatened to purposely
exterminate the herds if some agreement could not be reached. But
diplomatic wheels turn slowly; it wasn't until May 5, 1911, that a
quadrapartite conference became a reality.
The North Pacific Sealing Convention of 1911, the
result of the quadrapartite conference, was "a major victory for the
conservation of natural resources, a signal triumph for diplomacy, and a
landmark in the history of international cooperation." (20) As a
conservation measure, the Convention prohibited pelagic sealing by
citizens of the signatory nations, compensating their governments with a
percentage of the land harvest. The Convention confirmed the principle
that the countries owning rookeries had the right to control the land
harvest. The Treaty was for fifteen years and "as long thereafter as it
should remain undenounced by one or more signatories." (21) The Treaty
actually remained in effect, except for a period during World War II,
until 1985 when it expired without renewal.
The Convention marked a new age in American
diplomacy. It was one of the earliest appeals to a head of state,
foreshadowing President Woodrow Wilson's personal diplomacy at the close
of World War I. President William H. Taft broke a conference deadlock by
sending a personal appeal to the Emperor of Japan. (22)
The Convention was a landmark in the history of
international cooperation. The Treaty mandated research. It created a
Standing Scientific Committee which met a week before the Sealing
Commission in order to exchange data. Through cooperation and shared
research the body of knowledge of the northern fur seal is the inmost
complete of all marine mammals. It was, and still is, used as a model
for other species of marine mammals. (23) Through its mandate for
research and cooperation in the sciences, the Convention not only stood
as a landmark in international conservation policy making, but was
instrumental in increasing the world's body of knowledge.
The North Pacific Sealing Convention remained in
effect until World War II. From 1942 to 1957 the fur seals were
protected by a provisional agreement between the United States and
Canada. In 1957 a new interim North Pacific Fur Seal Convention was
concluded between Canada, Japan, the Union of Soviet Socialist
Republics, and the United States, which remained in effect until 1985
when it expired without renewal. For all practical purposes the
conmercial sealing industry ended with the expiration of the treaty.
Sealing is no longer the primary concern on Saint Paul and Saint George
Islands. Community leaders on both islands are working to establish a
diversified economic base. Development on Saint Paul Island includes
the oil industry, tourism, and fisheries. Saint George is constructing
a boat harbor and marine repair facility at Zapadni, and Tanaq
Corporation is involved in fisheries and a limited tourist industry. The
seals no longer control the islands as they did throughout the period of
significance.
Ethnic Heritage
The resident Aleut laborer was a constant element in
the fur seal industry. Russian and American administrators alike
imported Aleuts from the Aleutian Chain to these uninhabited islands for
the sole purpose of harvesting and processing the fur seals. Attentive
to the linguistic affiliation of the native peoples, Russian
administrators moved "Atka (central dialect) speakers to Medni Island...
and in establishing the Pribilof community they drew primarily upon
members of the Fox Island district (eastern dialect) forming dialect
isolates." (24) Administrators determined the size of the population by
the number of hunters and support staff needed to harvest the seals and
selected village locations because of proximity to the rookeries.
During the Second Charter of the Russian American
Company, 1821-1842, the Company established permanent villages on Saint
Paul and Saint George Islands. The Company supported a teacher and built
a school house on each island. It assumed responsibility for the
construction of churches and hospitals in the colony as
well. Beginning in 1861 the Company administered the
two islands separately.
The Russian language and the Russian Orthodox Church
became integral parts of Aleut life. Russian names were uniformly
adopted, particularly with the rite of baptism. A high degree of
community stability is indicated by the localization of family names
among the three dialect isolates. Of 158 different Aleut family names,
144 are uniquely localized. In other words, of 158 family names, 144 are
not shared between the dialect isolates and 14 are shared. (25)
In 1819 the first Russian Orthodox Church was built
out of driftwood on Saint Paul when the population of the Pribilof
Islands was 27 Russian males, 188 Aleut males, and 191 Aleut females.
In 1824 the Pribilofs were placed under the auspices of Bishop
Veniaminoff, later canonized Saint Innocent. In 1825 the Company
abandoned the Polovina site and moved to the present City of Saint Paul,
as it was considered "best to load and unload ships". (26) A church was
erected in the new village. In 1833 the Company built the first church
on Saint George Island. The Aleut people embraced Russian Orthodoxy as
their own. Years later a U. S. Treasury Agent reported that there was
a large church on Saint Paul, and a smaller one on Saint George. The
priest, formerly supported by the Russian American Company, beginning
with the lease period and thereafter was supported by the "pious
donations of the native". (27)
The end of the Russian period marked the beginning of
a process of Americanization. Upon taking possession after the sale in
1867 and the winning of the lease in 1870, the Alaska Commercial
Company, with the support of the Special Treasury Agent, destroyed
barabaras on both islands, as they were considered unhealthy.
The Company furnished material for above ground American style
frame house, lined with tar paper, painted, and furnished with a wood
stove and outhouse. The streets were laid out with the "foundations of
habitations regularly plotted there on". In 1881 the Agent reported the
"last building erected under Russia demolished". (28)
In 1890 when the Alaska Comercial Company lost its
lease to the North American Commercial Company the Schedule of Property
on Saint Paul and Saint George Islands filed by the Company included on
Saint Paul: one large dwelling house, one store building (retail), two
village store buildings, one barn and stable, one old warehouse,
(fishouse) one village salt house, one cove salt house, one large new
warehouse, one paint warehouse and wharf, one physicians home and
dispensary, one schoolhouse and furniture, sixty-three native
houses, one Northeast Point salt house, one Northeast Point Webster
House, one salt house at Half-way Point [Polovina], one ice house, and
one chicken house. Reported on Saint George: twenty-one native houses,
one dwelling house, with furniture, household effects, library, one
store building, one warehouse and shop, coal storehouse, a slat house at
Zapadnie and dwelling. (29)
Under the lease system the Company paid the Aleuts a
piece rate, averaging about 40 or 50 cents a skin during the 1890s,
equalling about three percent of the harvest. Beginning in 1894,
Congress appropriated $19,500 annually for all but a year as a poverty
reduction measure. During the moratorium, dictated by the Sealing
Convention of 1911, the Aleut people were left without a cash income.
Foreseeing the problem, the Convention also designated the United States
Department of Commerce and its Bureau of Fisheries responsible for the
welfare of the Aleut people. As a result, the Aleuts were paid in
supplies from the government store and in coal. Work classification
determined the amount an individual received with fixed amounts set for
children, widows, teenagers, and the elderly. The only cash payments
made to Aleuts were for labor on the Naval radio station on Saint Paul
as the seal industry was the sole economic base for the islands. With
the end of the moratorium and the economic stimulus of World War I the
seal harvest began again in 1918, and Aleut laborers were paid wages,
supplies, and services based upon their position in the harvest and
processing.
Administrators, whether private or public, also were
responsible for housing and capital goods on the islands. In this way,
conditions for the people and of the buildings that they lived and
worked in were dependent upon the seal industry. A boom in the industry
was accompanied by a building boom on both islands. In 1925 the Special
Agent reported concrete walls poured for "white dwellings" on Saint
George. (30) The following year these dwellings were lettered, and in
1939 fences and cement sidewalls were built around them. In 1927 the
Agent reported "a new native village laid over top of the old village."
Each house was torn down and replaced in turn. In 1928 these houses were
numbered. Construction of new houses continued intermittently throughout
the period of significance. In 1933 the Agent reported electricity
installed in native homes.
There were many large building projects as well
between 1926 and 1940: Old Government House torn down; The Saint George
Rooming House built; a new barn, salt house; accomodations for married
employees; a garage; a warehouse at Zapadni in both 1933 and 1938, a new
school, a watchhouse at Staraya Artil, a building for electrical power
and cold storage, an extension to the garage, the new Saint George the
Great Martyr Russian Orthodox Church, a bunkhouse for natives, and a new
Community Hall begun in 1940 but not completed until after World War
II.
The building boom followed much the same pattern on
Saint Paul Island. In 1928 the Special Agent reported "Native houses
numbered." In the following years he
reported intermittent construction of new native
dwellings of poured concrete. Between 1930 and 1939, the Agent reported
a building boom: an extension to the blubbering house, an electrical
plant and cold storage building, new Government House, the placement of
sod around the dispensary and hospital, sod and concrete sidewalks
around the three white cottages, a bunkhouse for sealing assistants, a
garage, salt house extension, nine outside laundry houses, new school,
new recreation hall, a watchhouse at Maroonitch, a road to East Landing
and Reef Rookery, a road to Northeast Point and Zapadni.
On June 3 and 4, 1942, the Japanese bombed Dutch
Harbor and Unalaska Island in the Aleutian Chain. On June 7th Japanese
landed on the Aleutian Islands of Kiska and Attu. On June 14 the Special
Agent on Saint Paul received orders to prepare to evacuate the entire
population of Saint Paul Island within twenty-four hours. The Navy
removed Saint Paul Aleuts to an abandoned cannery at Funter Bay on
Admiralty Island in Southeast Alaska and Saint George Aleuts to an old
mine site across the bay from the cannery. They remained there, except
for a sealing crew sent back in 1943 and individuals who found work in
Southeast Alaska, for the duration. In the decade following World War II
the Pribilofs became a voting district, had scheduled air service, a
post office, and Pribilof Aleuts joined the Alaska Native Brotherhood. A
sense of community was encouraged by the new administrative system that
came with statehood. The U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service retained
control over the seals of the islands, but not the labor force.
The people of the Saint Paul and Saint George share a
common ancestry with the Aleutian Aleut people. Their heritage is Aleut,
characterized by a "fundamental combination of self-sufficiency and
cooperation (that) has led to long term durability of Aleut communities,
to many persistencies, and to their ability to adapt to new and
difficult circumstances." Village organization is Aleut, having made a
"smooth transition from the 'headman' or head men of pre-Russian
times, through the system of First, Second and Third Chief practiced
during Russian occupation, to the President, Vice-President and
Secretary-Treasurer of today." (31) Their family names and religion have Russian
roots. Even today, religious services are still conducted in three
languages: Aleut, Russian, and English. Their developing economy is
international as diversification brings the oil and fishing industries
to the is lands.
The people of Saint George and Saint Paul share one
characteristic that sets them apart from other Aleut people. The
Pribilof Aleuts have had a much shorter life expectancy. While "life
expectancy during the Russian period is, on the average greater than
both Aleutian and Pribilof Aleuts under American rule... Aleutian
Aleuts living from 1867 to 1946 have, on average, enjoyed a greater life
expectancy at all ages than the average for Pribilof Aleuts." While
there is an unusually high instance of infant mortality among the
Pribilof Aleuts, evidence shows that "the magnitude of the difference is
slightly reduced with increasing age, but always in substantial favor of
the Aleutian Aleut." (32) Research has determined no precise cause for
this phenomenon, but does suggest that "the differences must be
considered to reflect environmental conditions" rather than genetic
differences. (33)
The consistent elements throughout the period of
significance are the dominance of the fur seal industry in island life,
the international concern for conservation of the herds, and the
management of the Aleut people as a labor force. All these elements
persisted past mid-century despite the disruptions of World War II.
While the Aleut people were evacuated to Funter Bay for the duration,
sealing teams were brought back to the islands for the harvest. After
the war, when the Aleut people were returned to the Pribilofs, life
began again in the same patterns.
Historic conditions that governed the industry were
not changed by World War II. The change was a gradual process occasioned
by new international concerns about the industry, Alaska statehood, and
new conditions of island life.
International concerns about the sealing industry
changed in the 1950s from protecting the seals from pelagic hunts to a
commitment to modern scientific research necessary to determine the
effect of the seal herds on commercial fisheries. In 1950, Mr.
Thompson from the Committee on Merchant Marine and Fisheries explained
that the purpose of the amendment to the 1944 act of entitlement to the
1942 Fur Seal agreement was to appropriate funds in order to:
extend protection to other marine mammals; extend
government control to the by-products of the seal industry and the
harvest of any other animal resources of the islands; and to provide for
"the maintenance and care of the native inhabitants." This purpose was
well within the spirit of the original 1911 Convention. The 1957
multilateral Interim Convention on Conservation of North Pacific Fur
Seals was a new departure. The objective of the new Convention was to
sustain the herds at a level that allowed the greatest harvest "with due
regard to their relation to the productivity of other living marine
resources of the area." Scientific research was the key element. By
directive, the subject of research included the age, mortality,
migration routes, and the "extent to which the food habits of fur seals
affect commercial fish catches and the damage fur seals inflict on
fishing gear." The Convention established the North Pacific Fur Seal
Commission to implement research and make recommendations for controls.
This objective was not in the conservation and preservation spirit of
the original 1911 Convention, rather it was concerned with the effect of
the seals on the commercial fishing industry.
Elements of change in Alaska, coupled with the
inherent change that occurs when a territory becomes a state, affected
the administration of the islands and island life when Alaska statehood
came in the 1950s. Section 6 (e) of the Alaska Statehood Act of July 7,
1958 awarded the state of Alaska seventy percent of the net proceeds of
the Pribilof seal industry. The new state legislature enjoined the
federal government, who still controlled the harvest, to bring Aleut
wages to the state minimum. In 1959 the federal government abolished its
fisheries office in Alaska. While the Aleut people remained the
singular labor force for the industry, island life changed throughout
the 1950s as well. Islanders became active in the Alaska Native
Brotherhood and worked to alleviate their disparate condition. The
people of Saint Paul and Saint George shared with the rest of Alaska the
boom, and the changes that came with it, in the 1950s. Their
relationship with the federal administrators changed as the Aleut people
assumed more control of their political and private lives. The Special
Agent for the islands made his last entry into his daily log in 1960. A
unique era in American labor history came to an end.
CRITERIA EXCEPTION:
Structures built between 1942 and 1960 are deemed to
have exceptional significance, although they are not all fifty years
old. The sealing processes and social structure on the islands remained
virtually unchanged from the pre-war period, so that the functions and
configurations of the newer buildings, whether housing or commercial,
were the same as in the 1920s-1930s. The Department of Interior even
maintained the old pattern of constructing new buildings on the
foundations of the old. The equipment in the 1950s seal processing
plant on Saint George reflects the early methods of processing with its
kench tables, blubbering racks, and the rare redwood brine tank.
Although there is no single event or date to mark the terminus of the
historic period, by 1960 the historic conditions no longer exclusively
determine the course of the industry or island life.
NHL NAME:
Saint George and Saint Paul Islands have had many
names. Seal Islands is the one name that has been consistently used
from the days before discovery when tales were told about mythical fog
shrouded islands in the Bering Sea, through the American period on both
official documents and by such spokesmen as Henry Elliott, to an Academy
Award winning Disney film in the 1950s. The present designation of Fur
Seal Rookeries is too narrow to reflect the rich history of the
industry, the seals, and the people. Seal Islands is the most
historically consistent and the name which best reflects the character
of the National Historic Landmark.
Endnotes
1. For an overview of Russian-America see: James R. Gibson, Imperial
Russia in Frontier America. (New York: Oxford University Press, 1976) Hector
Clevigny, Russian America: The Great Alaska
Venture 1741-1867. (Oregon: Binford and Mort, 1979).
2. Henry Ward Elliott, Our Arctic Provinces:
Alaska and the Seal Islands (New York: Charles Scribner's Sons,
1887), p. 231.
3. U.S., Department of Commerce and Labor, Bureau of
Fisheries, Report of the Commissioner of Fisheries for the Fiscal
Year 1909 and Special Papers, p. 5.
4. Clarence C. Hulley, Alaska: Past and
Present (Portland, Oregon: Binford and Mort, 1970), p. 356.
5. Petr Alehsandrivich Tikhmenev, A History of the
Russian American Company, trans. ed. Richard A. Pierce and Alton S.
Donnelly (Seattle: University of Washington Press, 1978), p. 153.
6. Ibid., p 397.
7. Hulley, p. 397.
8. Susan Hackley Johnson, The Pribilof Islands: A
Guide to Saint Paul, Alaska (Saint Paul: Tanadgusix Corporation,
1978), pp. 14-15.
9. U.S., Department of Commerce, Bureau of Fisheries,
Report of the United States Commissioner of Fisheries for the Fiscal
Year 1922, p. 45.
10. U.S., Department of Commerce, Bureau of
Fisheries, Report of the United States Commissioner of Fisheries for
the Fiscal Year 1924, p. 111.
11. U.S., Department of Commerce, Bureau of
Fisheries, Report of the United States Commissioner of Fisheries for
the Fiscal Year 1930, p. xv.
12. U.S., Department of the Interior, Bureau of
Fisheries, Report of the United States Commissioner of Fisheries
1940, p. 305.
13. U.S., Department of the Interior, Fish and
Wildlife Service, Fur Seals of the Pribilof Islands, by Ralph C.
Baker, Conservation in Action, No. 12 (Washington, D.C.: Government
Printing Office, 1957, pp. 18-19.
14. Hulley, p. 398.
15. Tikhmenev, p. 88.
16. Ibid, p. 358.
17. U.S. Fish Commission, Division of Statistics,
Past and Future of the Seal, by Joseph Stanley-Brown,
Bulletin of the United States Fish Commission, Vol. XIII. for
1893 (Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office. 1894), p.
362.
18. Johnson, pp. 14-15.
19. Morgan Sherwood, "Seal Poaching in the North
Pacific: Japanese Raids on the Pribilofs, 1906," Alaska History
1:1 (1984): 45.
20. Thomas A. Bailey, "The North Pacific Sealing
Convention of 1911," in Essays Diplomatic and Undiplomatic of Thomas
A. Bailey, ed. Alexander Deconde Armin Rappaport (New York:
Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1969), p. 168.
21. Ibid, p. 183.
22. Ibid, p. 281.
23. Interview with Roger Gentry, August 1985.
24. Aleut Community of Saint Paul Island,
Alaska, (New York: Clearwater Publishing Company, Inc., 1976), p.
3.
25. Ibid, p. 5.
26. Elliott, p. 231.
27. For a complete discussion of the
RussianAmerica Company and the role of the Russian Orthodox Church
see: Svetlana Federovna, The Russian Population in Alaska and
California, Late Eighteenth Century-1867 trans. ed. Richard A.
Pierce and Alton S. Donnelly (Ontario: Limestone Press, 1973) Barbara S.
Smith, Russian Orthodoxy in Alaska: A History, Inventory, and
Analysis of Church Archives in Alaska, with an annotated
bibliography (Anchorage, Alaska: Alaska Historical Commission, 1980).
For a discussion of the condition of the Aleut people in the American
period see: Dorothy Knee Jones, A Century of Servitude: Pribilof
Aleuts Under U.S. Rule (Washington, D.C., University Press of
America, 1980).
28. "Special Reports," Pribilof Islands Collection,
University of Alaska, Fairbanks, Alaska.
29. "Schedule of Property on Saint Paul and Saint
George Islands," Pribilof Islands Collection, University of Alaska,
Fairbanks, Alaska.
30. "Special Reports," Pribilof Islands Collection,
University of Alaska, Fairbanks, Alaska.
31. W.S. Laughlin, "Aleut Community Cohesiveness and
Tribal Integrity," in Aleut Community of Saint Paul Island,
Alaska, (New York: Clearwater Publishing Company, Inc., 1976), p.
7.
32. "Life Expectancy and Survivorship among the
Pribilof Aleuts," in Aleut Community of Saint Paul Island,
Alaska, (New York: Clearwater Publishing Company, Inc., 1976, p.
105.
33. Ibid, p. 112.

9. Major Bibliographical References
Aleut Community of Saint Paul Island,
Alaska. New York: Clearwater Publishing Company, Inc., 1976.
Bailey, Thomas A. "North Pacific Sealing Convention,
1911." In Essays Diplomatic and Undiplomatic by
Thomas A. Bailey, pp. 168-187. Edited by Alexander Deconde and Armin
Rappaport. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1969.
Chevigny, Hector. Russian America: The
Great Alaskan Venture, 1741-1867. Oregon: Binford and Mort, 1979.
Elliott, Henry W. Our Arctic Province: Alaska and
the Seal Islands. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons, 1887.
The Seal Islands of Alaska. Government
Printing Office, 1881; reprint ed., Ontario: Limestone Press, 1976.
Federova, Svetlana G. The Russian Population in
Alaska and California, Late Eighteenth Century-1867. Trans. and ed.
Richard A. Peirce and Alston S. Donnelly. Ontario: Limestone Press, 1973.
Gibson, James R. Imperial Russia in Frontier
America. New York: Oxford University Press, 1976.
Hrdlicka, Ales. The Aleutian and Commander
Islands and Their Inhabitants. Philadelphia: Wister Institute of
Anatomy and Biology, 1945.
Hulley, Clarence C. Alaska: Past and
Present. Portland, Oregon: Binford and Mort, 1970
Hunt, William R. Arctic Passage: The
Turbulent History of the Land and People of the Bering Sea,
1697-1975. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons, 1975.
Johnson, Susan Hackley. The Pribilof Islands:
A Guide to Saint Paul, Alaska. Saint Paul: Tanadgusix
Corporation, 1978.
Jones, Dorothy Knee. A Century of Servitude:
Pribilof Aleuts Under U. S. Rule. Washington, D. C.:
University Press of America, 1980.
"Kratkaya tserkobno-statechstucheskaya opasanie
svyata-georgievskoi, na sb. Georgia, tserkbi k eya praboclakmavo
prehoda" (Brief statistical
account of the Saint George Orthodox Parish on the
Island of Saint George) Amerikanskii pravoslavnyi vestnik
(Russian Orthodox American Messenger) III March 27, 1899, pp.
175-177.
Makarovna, V. Russians on the Pacific. 1743-1799.
Trans. and ed. by Richard A. Pierce and Alton S. Donnelly, Ontario: Limestone
Press, 1975. "Novy Krem na ostroy sv. Georgia" (New Church on
Saint George Island). Amerikanskii Pravoslavnyi vestnik (Russian
Orthodox American Messenger) XXXIL, July 1936, pp. 69-70.
"Ostrob sv. Georgia" (Island of Saint George).
Amerikanskii Pravoslavnyi vestnik (Russian
Orthodox American Messenger) III, February 27, 1899, p. 127.
Sherwood, Morgan. "Seal Poaching in the North
Pacific: Japanese Raids in the Pribilofs, 1906." Alaska History
1 (Fall 1984): 45-53.
Smith, Barbara S. Russian Orthodoxy in Alaska: A
History, Inventory, and Analysis of the Church Archives in Alaska, with
an annotated bibliography. Anchorage, Alaska: Alaska Historical Commission,
1980.
State of Alaska, Department of Fish and Game, Division of
Subsistence, "The Pribilof Island Aleuts: Tentative Players in a
Hybrid Economy" by Michael Orback and Beverly Holmes in Contemporary
Subsistence Economies of Alaska by Steve J. Langdon. nd.
State of Alaska, Department of Transportation and
Public facilities, Division of Planning and Programming. Pribilof
Special Report of Federally Owned Facilities, Saint Paul and Saint
George. Anchorage: Habitat North, Architects and Planners, March
1982.
Tikkhmenev, Petr Alehsandrivich. A History of the
Russian-American Company. Translated and edited by Richard A. Pierce
and Alton S. Donnelly, Seattle: University of Washington Press, 1978.
U.S. Army, Narrative Report of Alaska Construction
1941-1944 by James D. Bushm Jr., Lt. Colonel, CE. Chief of
Operations, Construction Division, Engineer, Alaska Department, Prepared
in accordance with memorandum from Headquarters Alaskan Defense Command,
5 October 1943.
U.S. Department of Commerce and Labor, Bureau of
Fisheries, Annual Report of the United States Commissioner of
Fisheries for the Fiscal Year 1909.
U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Fisheries,
Annual Report of the United States Commissioner of Fisheries for the
Fiscal Year 1918-1939.
U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Fisheries,
Annual Report of the United States Commissioner of Fisheries
1940.
U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife
Service Fur Seals of the Pribilof Islands by Ralph C. Baker.
Conservation in Action, No. 12. Washington, D. C.: Government Printing
Office, 1957.
U.S. Navy. Maps. 21 Naval Construction Battalion,
Records, Unalaska, Office of Command Historian, Naval Construction
Center, Port Hueneme, California.
Interviews
Dixon, Greg. State of Alaska, Geological and
Geophysical Survey Division, Anchorage, July and September 1985.
Gentry, Roger. National Marine Fisheries Service,
Pribilof Islands Program, St. George, August 1985.
Hiajny, Dick. Tour Guide, Saint Paul, August
1985.
Kashevarof, Andronik. Deacon, Saint George the Great
Martyr Russian Orthodox Church, Saint George, August 1985.
Merculieff, Anthony. Tanaq Corporation, Saint George,
August 1985.
Philemonoff, Ron. IRA Tribal Council, Saint Paul, August
1985.
Stepetin, Lavrenty. Holy Martyrs Saints Peter and
Paul Russian Orthodox Church, Saint Paul, August 1985.
10. Geographical Data
Acreage of nominated property: 6,970 acres; Quadrangle name: Pribilof Island, Alaska;
Quadrangle scale: 1:250,000
UTM REFERENCES
St. Paul Village:
A-02/540510/6330270
B-02/540300/6330920
C-02/530820/6320480
D-02/540280/5330500
Northeast Point:
A-02/550420/6340510
B-02/540940/6330550
C-02/540600/6340480
D-02/550300/6340630
St. George:
A-02/590260/6270410
B-02/580620/6270350
C-02/580530/6270440
D-02/590160/6270500
BOUNDARY JUSTIFICATION
The boundaries of the Seal Islands National Historic
Landmark District are shown as the thick black line on accompanying Map
2: Saint George Island and Map 4: Saint Paul Island and further described
in Section 7.
The boundary includes the communities, rookeries with
adjacent killing grounds, and old village sites that have historically
been associated with the sealing industry, the conservation of the
herds, and the Aleut people. Sections of the islands are excluded from
the District because they were not essential to the industry or
development has destroyed visual integrity.
11. Form Prepared By
Sandra McDermott Faulkner
National Park Service, Alaska Region
2525 Gambell Street
Anchorage, Alaska
3/14/86
12. State Historic Preservation Officer Certification




|
|
|